Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
He broke reporting restrictions which is covered by the offence of contempt of court.
Contempt of court is ruled upon by the judge.
Contempt of court rulings are often dealt with very quickly. (Judges have the power to act summarily).
He did this while already under a suspended sentence for the same offence.
The appeal court ruled that he'd been sent down too hastily, in that the offence wasn't properly scrutinised, plus other issues.
My guess is the judge was pissed off with Robinson for apparently jeopardising the trial. If you want to call that vindictiveness, feel free. But it is tin-foil-hat conspiracy to suggest that this was under the direction of anyone else, or that this case is indicative of systematic failures in the British legal system.
and we are agreeing - sentence in haste -> probably pay compensation to scumbags.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
75 per cent of recorded Type 1 group abusers, who target victims based on their vulnerability, were Asian. The Office for National Statistics estimates that 7.5 per cent of the UK’s population are Asian.
From the information available, we know that actual number of group abusers who are Asian is around three times higher than the number of group abusers who are white.
its a specific type of crime that seems pretty aligned with a culture.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
its a specific type of crime that seems pretty aligned with a culture.
So to make your point you need to focus on the circumstances of the crime even though statistically the crime in general is no less likely to be committed by anyone of a different ethnicity.
If an underage girl is married off, even when she's of age her "husband" should automatically be excluded from coming to the UK.
I think you'll find that under UK law, rape is recognised within marriage, regardless of age. The problem is that as the law stands, the girls have to formally complain. Few do. But if they do, their "husbands" should indeed be prosecuted for rape - and deported (if they were bought in on the grounds of the "marriage").
Hasn't the law changed recently that a spouse can only come into the UK if the (or their partner) earn enough?
Yes but as someone was banging on about in another thread - the rules are not there to be followed but circumvented - and if you need to play the racist, xenophobic, islamaphobia, anti-semantism etc etc card - then all the better because they no one will question you.
FGM is supposed to be illegal here - does not stop 100's maybe 1000's of girls each year being taken from this country, mutilated, and then bought back here - if that does not drive a huge nail into the 'integrated society' coffin I do not know what does.
Knife crime is bad - but generally it is gang related and often the people being stabbed are tooled up as well.
This is a crime against ten or eleven year old defenceless girls who are lied to from birth.
You can call it any way you want but it is a barbaric practice which should have been outlawed millennia ago - but if they want to act like animals......
Comment