Originally posted by FrontEnder
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
More police sexism
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
I agree the police need looking at but also if someone makes a false accusation and it can be proven to be malicious then they should face some kind of punishment.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThe focus here should not be the accuser. Its the police.....
Just think when we all have contact lenses in that sync video to the cloud automatically it's going to be much easier to prove these things.Comment
-
While 10% of rapes end in conviction and that figure is seen as too low then it won't happen.Originally posted by woohoo View PostI agree the police need looking at but also if someone makes a false accusation and it can be proven to be malicious then they should face some kind of punishment.
Just think when we all have contact lenses in that sync video to the cloud automatically it's going to be much easier to prove these things.
You have to get with the program.
A great pity as way too many men are getting away with way too much. Encouraging false convictions won't move things forward.Comment
-
We need minority report stuff too......Originally posted by woohoo View PostJust think when we all have contact lenses in that sync video to the cloud automatically it's going to be much easier to prove these things.Comment
-
While I agree that no-one should be surprised, I'm not sure about the "silly enough". What's wrong with one parent not working, but focussing on the kids? You might not choose to do it that way, but plenty do.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIf a man is silly enough to agree that his wife didn't need to work and should be primary carer of their children when they were married, then he shouldn't be surprised that the family courts back that when they get divorced.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
My brother-out-law looks after the kids while my sister works.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostWhile I agree that no-one should be surprised, I'm not sure about the "silly enough". What's wrong with one parent not working, but focussing on the kids? You might not choose to do it that way, but plenty do.
It is generally better if one parent looks after the kids until they are at school and even then they should only work part-time until secondary school.
I remember picking baby bp up from nursery at lunch and some other girl called me daddy. She clearly wanted to be with her parents - made me want to cry.....Comment
-
Here's a controversial take:
Sir Ian McKellen: Women partly to blame for sex scandal | Daily Mail Online
Can we all have a massive argument about this please?"Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon MuskComment
-
No we bloody can't!Originally posted by Jog On View Post
Can we all have a massive argument about this please?Comment
-
I take great issue with that comment! You slag!Originally posted by GJABS View PostNo we bloody can't!Comment
-
Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment