Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
More police sexism
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIf a man is silly enough to agree that his wife didn't need to work and should be primary carer of their children when they were married, then he shouldn't be surprised that the family courts back that when they get divorced.
I could not agree more.Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostWelcome to the right wing politically correct world where to be misogynistic or racist is freedom of expression but to call them out it one of the worst things on CUK. And you could have just said 'I disagree.'Comment
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostA CUK member was smeared with a serious sex crime simply for expressing a view contradictory to yours.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostNo.Comment
-
Originally posted by FrontEnder View PostI understand that isn't anyones intention. However I firmly believe that would be how some rape victims would perceive things.
Black and white cases are rare. False allegations are rare. I don't think it's worth changing an important law that provides absolute protection to victims to counter a practically non existent problem.
It's quite possible to withdraw consent at any time you know.
What would have happened if this women had not been stupid enough to text him, so there was no independent proof? He would have been convicted. So we don't know how rare it is, even at 8% (metro article quoting a study) that's not rare to me.
I don't think it's wrong for a judge to decide if both parties should keep their anonymity or not.Comment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostHow rare are false allegations? Some figures that I've seen say around 8%, that's not rare to me. This guy would not have counted in these stats if his lawyer did not insist on seeing the evidence the police ignored.
What would have happened if this women had not been stupid enough to text him, so there was no independent proof? He would have been convicted. So we don't know how rare it is, even at 8% (metro article quoting a study) that's not rare to me.
I don't think it's wrong for a judge to decide if both parties should keep their anonymity or not.
I'm against the removal of the law that says a case can't be brought against the accuser in cases of sexual assault etc. Which is what would need to be done to punish her for lying.Comment
-
Originally posted by FrontEnder View PostI wasn't arguing against anonymity for the accused - I was the first in this thread to suggest it.
I'm against the removal of the law that says a case can't be brought against the accuser in cases of sexual assault etc. Which is what would need to be done to punish her for lying.Comment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostHow rare are false allegations? Some figures that I've seen say around 8%, that's not rare to me. This guy would not have counted in these stats if his lawyer did not insist on seeing the evidence the police ignored.
What would have happened if this women had not been stupid enough to text him, so there was no independent proof? He would have been convicted. So we don't know how rare it is, even at 8% (metro article quoting a study) that's not rare to me.
I don't think it's wrong for a judge to decide if both parties should keep their anonymity or not.
I am not sure of the best way forward. However it does appear that women need more intimacy before sex than men do.
Maybe there should be alot more use of sex robots?Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Comment