Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
More police sexism
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostIf a man is silly enough to agree that his wife didn't need to work and should be primary carer of their children when they were married, then he shouldn't be surprised that the family courts back that when they get divorced.
I could not agree more.Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostWelcome to the right wing politically correct world where to be misogynistic or racist is freedom of expression but to call them out it one of the worst things on CUK. And you could have just said 'I disagree.'Comment
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostA CUK member was smeared with a serious sex crime simply for expressing a view contradictory to yours.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by unixman View PostNo.Comment
-
Originally posted by FrontEnder View PostI understand that isn't anyones intention. However I firmly believe that would be how some rape victims would perceive things.
Black and white cases are rare. False allegations are rare. I don't think it's worth changing an important law that provides absolute protection to victims to counter a practically non existent problem.
It's quite possible to withdraw consent at any time you know.
What would have happened if this women had not been stupid enough to text him, so there was no independent proof? He would have been convicted. So we don't know how rare it is, even at 8% (metro article quoting a study) that's not rare to me.
I don't think it's wrong for a judge to decide if both parties should keep their anonymity or not.Comment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostHow rare are false allegations? Some figures that I've seen say around 8%, that's not rare to me. This guy would not have counted in these stats if his lawyer did not insist on seeing the evidence the police ignored.
What would have happened if this women had not been stupid enough to text him, so there was no independent proof? He would have been convicted. So we don't know how rare it is, even at 8% (metro article quoting a study) that's not rare to me.
I don't think it's wrong for a judge to decide if both parties should keep their anonymity or not.
I'm against the removal of the law that says a case can't be brought against the accuser in cases of sexual assault etc. Which is what would need to be done to punish her for lying.Comment
-
Originally posted by FrontEnder View PostI wasn't arguing against anonymity for the accused - I was the first in this thread to suggest it.
I'm against the removal of the law that says a case can't be brought against the accuser in cases of sexual assault etc. Which is what would need to be done to punish her for lying.Comment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostHow rare are false allegations? Some figures that I've seen say around 8%, that's not rare to me. This guy would not have counted in these stats if his lawyer did not insist on seeing the evidence the police ignored.
What would have happened if this women had not been stupid enough to text him, so there was no independent proof? He would have been convicted. So we don't know how rare it is, even at 8% (metro article quoting a study) that's not rare to me.
I don't think it's wrong for a judge to decide if both parties should keep their anonymity or not.
I am not sure of the best way forward. However it does appear that women need more intimacy before sex than men do.
Maybe there should be alot more use of sex robots?Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment