• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Drone smashes into Boeing passenger plane during landing

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Bee View Post
    Ground collision, are you serious!!!
    Looking at the image it's obvious that was Superman who collided with the plane, he was drunk.
    Nah. A slight nudge with something that weight moving forward is going to do a lot of damage, especially with hollow areas like noses.

    Drunk superman.. Are you like 12 or something?
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Bee View Post
      Ground collision, are you serious!!!
      Looking at the image it's obvious that was Superman who collided with the plane, he was drunk.


      Very serious.
      Look at the damage.
      Based on the size of an aircraft nose, how big would an object need to be to make those perfectly horizontal scrapes spaced that far apart?
      How fast was the object moving? If the plane was doing, let's say, 300km/h and it hit an object that weighed 50kg, guess what? The object might dent the plane but it would bounce off, not slide along it.
      If, on the other hand, the plane was stationary and a galley truck/set of stairs drove into it, it would cause a dent and then a score along the side of the plane until the truck stopped (or toppled over).


      If you doubt me, go to a supermarket and push a trolley up to the front wing of your car, then push it along the car.
      Now for the other side of your car, drive the car at a trolley.


      Examine the damage to the car.
      …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by WTFH View Post
        Very serious.
        Look at the damage.
        Based on the size of an aircraft nose, how big would an object need to be to make those perfectly horizontal scrapes spaced that far apart?
        How fast was the object moving? If the plane was doing, let's say, 300km/h and it hit an object that weighed 50kg, guess what? The object might dent the plane but it would bounce off, not slide along it.
        If, on the other hand, the plane was stationary and a galley truck/set of stairs drove into it, it would cause a dent and then a score along the side of the plane until the truck stopped (or toppled over).


        If you doubt me, go to a supermarket and push a trolley up to the front wing of your car, then push it along the car.
        Now for the other side of your car, drive the car at a trolley.


        Examine the damage to the car.
        You might care to investigate the damage a bird strike can do. No idea what the cause here was, but jumping to "cover-up" seems a little premature.

        Comment


          #24
          Interesting - linky

          I was hoping one of our resident "actually working in engineering" engineers would explain it to us.
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            #25
            It's been a side on impact from the starboard side. The starboard side has caved in and cracked the front of the radome. The fuselage aft of the radome isn't damaged either. So the plane was stationary or else whatever hit it would have left marks on the main body has it went down the side.

            Also If it had been hit by a drone why are bits of the drone not embedded in the plane?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Acme Thunderer View Post
              It's been a side on impact from the starboard side. The starboard side has caved in and cracked the front of the radome. The fuselage aft of the radome isn't damaged either. So the plane was stationary or else whatever hit it would have left marks on the main body has it went down the side.

              Also If it had been hit by a drone why are bits of the drone not embedded in the plane?
              Oh good, forensics are here. I love Internet forums.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Acme Thunderer View Post
                It's been a side on impact from the starboard side. The starboard side has caved in and cracked the front of the radome. The fuselage aft of the radome isn't damaged either. So the plane was stationary or else whatever hit it would have left marks on the main body has it went down the side.

                Also If it had been hit by a drone why are bits of the drone not embedded in the plane?
                Credentials?
                "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                  Credentials?
                  HND Mech Eng.
                  …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                    Be accurate. To think that rt.com is a source of reliable news requires you to already be stupid and blind.
                    Better or worse than Daily Mail though?
                    Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
                    I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

                    I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
                      Better or worse than Daily Mail though?
                      They have different biases and agendas. But in terms of trustworthiness, about the same.
                      Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X