• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Anyone Else Flying to UK on Friday

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    is there any reason why the baggage handling is not automated from aircraft to carousel ?

    it would be easy to implement, AND, more secure by removing human intervention

    just get a Van Riet conveyor to connect to the aircraft and woosh all of the bags into the airport, automatically, and scanned for security and no human intervention therefore reducing the risk of tampering

    vanriet must have a materials handling solution for this scenario

    Milan.

    Comment


      #12
      To add to the joy, no train services (HEX or Connect) betwixt HAL and PAD 24-29 Dec. You'll have to slum it on the Piccadilly (which is so very reliable) or get your chauffeur to collect you.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
        is there any reason why the baggage handling is not automated from aircraft to carousel ?

        it would be easy to implement, AND, more secure by removing human intervention

        just get a Van Riet conveyor to connect to the aircraft and woosh all of the bags into the airport, automatically, and scanned for security and no human intervention therefore reducing the risk of tampering

        vanriet must have a materials handling solution for this scenario

        Milan.
        Its not just getting bags off, its getting them on in the most efficient configuration to maximise space and balance the load. Humans are still inherently better at it than machines.
        "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DaveB View Post
          Its not just getting bags off, its getting them on in the most efficient configuration to maximise space and balance the load. Humans are still inherently better at it than machines.
          I'm sure they could find somebody fresh out of college who remembers how to implement a solution to the knapsack problem in Haskell

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by DaveB View Post
            Its not just getting bags off, its getting them on in the most efficient configuration to maximise space and balance the load. Humans are still inherently better at it than machines.
            That and the fact that manual labour is far cheaper for that specific task.

            Not to mention the fuss the Unions will kick if you even mention automation and redundancies - look at the tube driver strikes over driverless trains.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
              Life is inherently unfair. Most understand that. The gap between the richest 1% and the rest gets bigger each year. Younger people feel increasingly disenfranchised - though it would help if they voted.

              The sooner there are driverless trains, cars, planes and airports the better. A lot of the menial tasks can be automated.
              Unless there is a fundamental shift in society's views on work and benefits I fear this will make things worse, not better. Not unlike the demise of the mining industry, this time whole swathes of job types will become obsolete in short order, leaving vast numbers of people unemployed and without specialist skills. The NE is still badly wounded decades later and a real automation revolution could be far more serious and happen faster.

              The point of automation is often supposed to be to free people from the drudgery of menial work. But while society keeps the view that people 'should' work, this raises problems. We're simultaneously trying to get rid of jobs while criticising those who are unemployed.

              You can say the point is to leave only skilled jobs and we simply educate people to be able to do them but even if it's possible to educate all our kids to such a level, those who grew up without that education are left in the lurch for several decades until they die out. Plus of course, maybe there aren't enough highly skilled jobs that need doing.

              Bottom line, unless you can find something for those doing the menial jobs to do (and in fact lots of automatable jobs are actually not menial), and a way to give them money that doesn't anger everyone else "they're getting a free ride that's not fair" it's just going to be a huge problem.
              Science fiction often portray a society where work is no longer the norm due to automation, only highly skilled people or those who want to work have to... but it rarely explains how we get there from where we are now.

              As someone said it's driven by markets. That means there is no noble aim to free people of hard labour behind this. Purely the aim to avoid paying people to do the hard labour. It's going to be hard for governments of the developed world to regulate this transformation if/when it comes.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #17
                well it's not going to get better

                RPA is coming

                https://dupress.deloitte.com/dup-us-...utomation.html

                http://www.cio.com/article/3019587/i...utomation.html

                that's another swathe of jobs gone

                Milan.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Your immediate concerns are now allayed: UK airport staff call off 48-hour strike, Unite union says - BBC News

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
                    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
                    is there any reason why the baggage handling is not automated from aircraft to carousel ?

                    it would be easy to implement, AND, more secure by removing human intervention
                    Its not just getting bags off, its getting them on in the most efficient configuration to maximise space and balance the load. Humans are still inherently better at it than machines.
                    Just wait until it's all outsourced to the bobs....

                    Air India disappoints again! leaves behind luggage of 227 passengers

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Skiing in Austria hopefully!
                      "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X