• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Was: New forum posting rules Now:PC explains JSA

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Bee View Post
    Let's start to apply these rules with psycho.
    Just as I wondered how good it would be to focus our attention on a proper seasoned chunt ....

    Comment


      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
      Forum Rules - Contractor UK Bulletin Board



      Could you send me the name of your conveyancer via PM please and we'll get the ball rolling.......
      We reserve the right to identify you in response to a court order or threat of legal action.
      Does that mean Admin is going to inform on PC to the Dole Office?

      Comment


        Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
        ONLY one who admits to it.

        I'll bet others will claim it if they need to/are able to. Of course, no-one is going to actually admit it on the forum because that would look 'uncool'. But then no-one will find out what you do in real life so its the safety of an internet forum.

        Perhaps I'm just too honest....
        Sure, maybe there could be one or two others, however certainly not the norm. I'll go further and suggest your most vehement JSA critics, on here, never have and never will claim it.
        From a legal perspective, the way you handled your affairs, during that time, is questionable yet you won't let it lie. Your sig was proof of that.
        Last edited by MrMarkyMark; 15 June 2016, 10:18.
        The Chunt of Chunts.

        Comment


          Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
          Sure, maybe there could be one or two others, however certainly not the norm. I'll go further and suggest your most vehement JSA critics, on here, never have and never will claim it.
          From a legal perspective, the way you handled your affairs, during that time, is questionable yet you won't let it lie. Your sig is proof of that.
          Shall we keep out of this please?

          Comment


            Originally posted by rl4engc View Post
            ...or merely having the audacity to question any decision they made...
            At least on this board, we've never been bothered about decisions being questioned.

            Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
            OK. I will admit that I find it strange that I'm not allowed to have an opinion on it
            You are allowed to have an opinion on it. But you've been singled out as the only person in the history of the forum who's ever been told to stop expressing a specific opinion in the professional forums. Except for...

            Problem is no-one else on the forum will admit that its perfectly legal thing to do- thats all I ask.
            If that's all that's required, then yes - it's perfectly legal. NLUK thinks so too. I disagree with him that it's a last resort - as I have most definitely said before, I don't see anything wrong with it. Happy now?
            Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

            Comment


              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              Does that mean Admin is going to inform on PC to the Dole Office?
              Ah but I never lie or do anything illegal of course.
              Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

              Comment


                Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
                Sure, maybe there could be one or two others, however certainly not the norm. I'll go further and suggest your most vehement JSA critics, on here, never have and never will claim it.
                From a legal perspective, the way you handled your affairs, during that time, is questionable yet you won't let it lie. Your sig was proof of that.
                No its not. How many times? I went over this with a senior person at the jobcentre at the time. I had an off the record conversation also.

                Nothing I did either before, or during claiming was disallowed or even frowned upon. In fact, at the time, they were more than happy to process my claim because they knew I'd be very little trouble to them.

                Like I always say, dont claim if you dont want to. No odds to me at all. Just dont shout down people who want to claim.
                Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

                Comment


                  Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                  At least on this board, we've never been bothered about decisions being questioned.

                  You are allowed to have an opinion on it. But you've been singled out as the only person in the history of the forum who's ever been told to stop expressing a specific opinion in the professional forums. Except for...

                  If that's all that's required, then yes - it's perfectly legal. NLUK thinks so too. I disagree with him that it's a last resort - as I have most definitely said before, I don't see anything wrong with it. Happy now?
                  I can go to bed tonight happy....

                  So does this mean that any newbies that come on here and ask about it will be given an honest answer and not the "skewed by personal opinion" answer?
                  Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

                  Comment


                    I think its the general negative attitude towards benefits and the people that claim them, that keeps bubbling up. Plenty of Daily Mail types around this place

                    Access to any benefit is going to depend on your personal situation. I don't think blanket saying everyone could claim is going to be true is it ? Likewise say no one can is clearly bollocks as well ?

                    Comment


                      12 pages to try and figure out which mod was childish and establish that PC has a thing for trolling about JSA?

                      Couldn't one of the mods have simply PM'd PC to tell him that they've removed his signature?
                      The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X