Was: New forum posting rules Now:PC explains JSA

[FatLazyContractor]

Your advert could be here! For the low price of £1200 we are offering a unique opportunity to save yourself a fortune in NI contributions.

Playing PC's advocate, why exactly isn't the above sig piss taking?

[BrilloPad]

You do know that what look like his b00bs are actually his massive under-eye-bags from thinking too much about NLUK, don't you?

I have not met him. PC told me you PMed him inviting him to a threesome with some sheep. But he was busy descaling the kettle.

HTH

[psychocandy]

Ah, but you see that's all just a bit of "fun".
PC doesn't help his cause a lot of the time and seems to want his cake and eat it, IMO.
He's always bringing up JSA etc. In his posts, yet gets all bolshie, LOL, when someone else does it.

OK. I will admit that I find it strange that I'm not allowed to have an opinion on it so I do tend to stick up for it a bit.

Problem is no-one else on the forum will admit that its perfectly legal thing to do- thats all I ask. If you dont want to, for whatever reason, then dont. But we've had newbies being told you can't do it because thats why.

Thats letting personal opinion get in the way of fact - and its wrong.

[BrilloPad]

Those who act like twunts will lack this 'power' elsewhere (job, relationship, perhaps their finances, health, family etc.) so being able to excert what in their mind is 'power' on an anonymous message board gives them what they feel is missing in their lives.

You make me feel sorry for the mods. Well almost.....

[psychocandy]

Which is why he wasn't banned.

That balance is swinging in the other direction atm...

cojak - so no-one has answered me as to whether this was a single mod or mod team decison to edit my profile then?

[Pondlife]

Playing PC's advocate, why exactly isn't the above sig piss taking?

Because it's not true.

[eek]

7775

[FatLazyContractor]

O
Problem is no-one else on the forum will admit that its perfectly legal thing to do- thats all I ask.

...that we are all tax-dodging basterwards talking high morals. To put it precisely -> EGO.

[psychocandy]

I find this whole thread a bit cheeky PC.

Someone provides a site that allows you to post for free, subject to you following certain rules.

You are now telling them how to run their business as you don't like the way the rules are being implemented.

Just cancel your subscription and take your business elsewhere if you're not happy with the service you're getting FFS.

I guess somewhere there are rules which outline terms of behaviour and consequences of breaking the rules thereof i.e bans etc. I have no problem with this.

BUT I'll bet my morgage that nowhere does it say if you break the rules your sig will be replaced with a childish insult? If its there then I stand corrected.

You mention the running of the business. I don't know who owns contractoruk and what the mods involvement in this is. If the mods do own the forum then you're right they can do as they please.

I do wonder if the true owner of the forum would stand by the recent actions though?

Maybe Im wrong and the mod who did the deed owns this forum after all - then I'll look stupid!

[FatLazyContractor]

Because it's not true.

Exactly my point. It is called 'Opinion'