- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Renewables don't work
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by pjclarke View PostMore than half never read beyond the headline. They're a valuable propaganda tool.
Gates is right, but he is talking more in the sense that the sheer scale of the problem demands better solutions - including renewables - than the ones we have invested in now, which is different from the 'renewables won't cut it' spin of the Reg coverage. If you've seen his TED presentation he talks about the need to reduce carbon emissions to zero, the Kaya Identity and the need to decarbonise:
**
A solution that works needs a response far greater than the market has so far delivered, delayed in part by the efforts of people who argue we don't even have a problem ...
Bill Gates: Innovating to zero! | TED Talk | TED.com
Your quite right when Bill Gates says
Gates told the Financial Times that the only way current technology could reduce global emissions is at “a beyond astronomical cost” and that innovation is the only way to reach a positive scenario.
Obviously I misunderstood, I thought that what he was saying was the only way current technology could reduce global emissions is at “a beyond astronomical cost” and that innovation is the only way to reach a positive scenario.
sorry about that.I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostYour quite right when Bill Gates says
So what he means is that the current technology is perfectly acceptable.
Obviously I misunderstood, I thought that what he was saying was the only way current technology could reduce global emissions is at “a beyond astronomical cost” and that innovation is the only way to reach a positive scenario.
sorry about that.
Now they need billions spent on R&D in order to get to where he claimed they were years ago.
Put the goalposts down pj.(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Comment
-
So what he means is that the current technology is perfectly acceptable.My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.Comment
-
Originally posted by pjclarke View PostWe could parse this all day, what he did not say is renewables don't work, which were the words you put in his mouth.
the only way current technology could reduce global emissions is at “a beyond astronomical cost”
Last edited by BlasterBates; 29 June 2015, 11:14.I'm alright JackComment
-
Only a few short years ago we were told that these renewables were economical and could compete with coal oil and gas on the open market.
Gates' remarks are informed by the need to get to zero carbon emissions, which is a rather more ambitious, but still necessary goal than mere grid parity. As to the 'billions', we should divert some of the 0.7% of global GDP that currently goes on fossil subsidies. But we won't.
HTH.My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostCan we agree on ....
the only way current renewables technology alone could reduce global emissions to the degree necessary to prevent dangerous climate change is at “a beyond astronomical cost”
I think that captures Gates' meaning a little more accurately.Last edited by pjclarke; 29 June 2015, 11:27.My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.Comment
-
Does Denmark accurately represent the terrain, weather and population density of the world's developed nations?
You might as well hold Scotland up as an example why Netherlands should base all their energy needs on non-tidal hydro.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
This is the border between the Dominican republic and Haiti.
The country on the left is a 'green paradise' fully embracing renewables. The country on the right has stuck with fossil fuels.
The poor sods on the left in Haiti ,have had to burn nearly every bit of wood they can lay their hands on for fuel for cooking , warmth and light.(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment