Originally posted by turbowoowoo
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Rehabilitation of Offenders
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostThe Act exists in order to assist ex offenders in reintegration by, after set periods, allowing certain convictions to be spent. With some exceptions, spent convictions don't need to be disclosed to employers. Unspent coconvictions do have to be disclosed and employers can make a decision as they wish.
Not only is his conviction unspent, the clock hasn't even started yet.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostBut he is not hiding the conviction. His prospect employes are very well aware who he is and what he was convicted for. The problem is that they can't hire him because the mob is stopping them from doing so.
Football and footballers live by the media and public exposure - unfortunately they die by it, too.Comment
-
Originally posted by Acme Thunderer View PostI personally find the thought of someone having sex with someone that is so drunk it is debatable if they consent or not, morally reprehensible and would not associate myself with anyone that did this. This so called "mob hype" is actually people expressing the same opinion.
Both the girl involved and Evans were pissed.
I hate rapists, I detest them, but justice by the mob is a downward slope...Comment
-
Originally posted by vwdan View Postthe VAST majority are voicing an opinion
Since when "vast majority" got the right to stop somebody from getting a legit job?
The "opinion" moved over to death threats and apparently even rape threats.
He's got the right to work legitimately and it's between him and his employers, in fact it's best for the justice system if he gets work to stop reoffending.
What these people would be saying IF his conviction gets quashed on allowed appeal???Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat vast majority???
Since when "vast majority" got the right to stop somebody from getting a legit job?
The "opinion" moved over to death threats and apparently even rape threats.
He's got the right to work legitimately and it's between him and his employers, in fact it's best for the justice system if he gets work to stop reoffending.
Some may have taken it to a wrong level, and I condemn those people. I don't buy they were instrumental in this decision though. I reckon Oldham thought they could stand a bit of heat and get a bargain of a deal - but it turned out people don't like rapists.Comment
-
Posted in the other thread, but you can read the facts of the case here
https://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-...-chedwyn-evans
It explains why the other footballer was acquitted - she had chosen to get in a taxi, go to his hotel and up to his room, therefore reasonable to assume, as she has no memory of the night, that she consented to sex with him.Comment
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostThe public have a right to canvass and protest and any commercial organisation with any sense will listen to their customers and potential customers.Comment
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostIt explains why the other footballer was acquitted - she had chosen to get in a taxi, go to his hotel and up to his room, therefore reasonable to assume, as she has no memory of the night, that she consented to sex with him.
I've read that she was estimated to be 2.5 over driving limit. DRIVING LIMIT, but we are not talking about driving and don't tell me that tonight nobody will shag a girl who is 2.5 times over driving limit, which by the same isn't the same as being unconscious.
Most important none of this really matters since he SERVED HIS TIME IN JAIL - he did not escape and was let out at the time that justice system (not mob) decided he should, his conviction is not SPENT, but he certainly did his time as the law required. Now he wants to get the only job he can do - 10 more years from now he will be too old to do it.
The are lots of drink drivers out there who were drunk and killed people - BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT! And many of them don't even do jail time at all, and I am sure plenty of them later get back to driving. Where is the mob demanding justice?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment