Originally posted by suityou01
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Maths question II
Collapse
X
-
-
This bit intends to mislead. It suggests a random game.Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostWhen you make your guess, one of the other two doors is opened. If there is a car, you lose.
If the game is played where the first door opened can be a car, then it doesn't matter if you switch or not. Its 50/50.
However, if the game is played so that the first door opened by Monty is never a car (because he knows where it is), then you get a 2/3rd's chance of winning by switching choice.
2/3rds of the time you initially picked wrong and Monty has to hide the door with the car. And during that 2/3rds he always eliminates the door with no car for you.
Do I win a prize?Comment
-
Have aOriginally posted by xoggoth View PostWhat is with these one line negative comments?
Don't like a post? Close it. Why waste time commenting?
,
Comment
-
because they are sad.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostWhat is with these one line negative comments?
Don't like a post? Close it. Why waste time commenting?Comment
-
Here it is explained.
Understanding the Monty Hall Problem | BetterExplained
The point is if Monty doesn't know where the car was he would sometimes open a door where the car is. Therefore overall it would be a 50/50, presuming that you made a choice without knowing what was behind the door which Monty opened, and that sometimes he opened a door with the car behind. In the cases where he opens a door and there isn't a car and you know there isn't a car, you have a higher probability of finding the car behind the other door.
If there were a hundred doors, you pick one and then he opens the other 98 then the chances are almost certain that the car is behind the other door, because the door you selected only had a 1/100 chance of having the car, whereas the other door has a 99/100 chance. With three doors it isn't as clear.Last edited by BlasterBates; 4 October 2014, 13:21.I'm alright JackComment
-
Mr C has just explained it to me using 100 doors. It IS much clearer that way.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostHere it is explained.
Understanding the Monty Hall Problem | BetterExplained
Yes the key is Monty is opening a door where he knows the car isn't. Therefore the other door is more likely to have the car behind it.
If there were a hundred doors, you pick one and then he opens the other 98 then the chances are almost certain that the car is behind the other door. With three doors it isn't as clear."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
I disagree. The number of doors is irrelevant to me. The only thing that 'solved' this for me was understanding that Monty must know where the car is, and he must play properly (i.e. never opening the door with a car) to ensure the player gets the decision to switch or not.Originally posted by cojak View PostMr C has just explained it to me using 100 doors. It IS much clearer that way.
If Monty doesn't know, and just plays a random game, even after opening 98 of the 100 doors without revealing the car, then you may as well keep your original choice. All he would have done is increase your chances from 1/100 to 1/2.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Comment