Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
PM: To Kate McCaan
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
They shouldn't have left their kids unattended. The reason is unimportant and irrelevant. Hence the editing of my post. -
The press are entitled to come knocking on your door if they want to ask you something, I think.Originally posted by Batcher View PostIt should have been the police knocking on her door if there had been a crime committed though.Is facing up to what you've done "being driven to take your life"?Sky News are obviously so embarrassed that they drove this woman to take her own life that they are not reporting on it.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
Does not compute!Originally posted by Batcher View PostI don't think any of her tweets were aimed directly at the McCanns so she wasn't trolling them. She was discussing the possibilities of what had happened in general and a few were quite nasty about the parents but, as they aren't on Twitter, they didn't see the tweets themselves.Comment
-
I rather think you've made your point quite clearOriginally posted by Churchill View PostThey shouldn't have left their kids unattended.
Perhaps we can take it as read that's your answer without you repeating it over and over
Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
So if the reason is unimportant why did you add the bit about them socialising?Originally posted by Churchill View PostThey shouldn't have left their kids unattended. The reason is unimportant and irrelevant. Hence the editing of my post.
Perhaps they are not like you who sits in the childs room at night for every minute of the day. perhaps they were prepared to take the risk based on the infrequency of child abductions that happen when families go on holiday.
Why do you feel the need to criticise them? Surely they have worked out for themselves their mistake. Unless of course you think that their punishment has not been sufficiently severe.
perhaps you should read this : Nobody loves to torture a 'bad mother' like the British | News Winnow
I am trying to understand at what point should they be absolved from your cruel criticism? If they had been sitting in the room when an armed gang crashed in and forcibly abducted her - would that have been acceptable to you sir? Or if mum and dad had just nipped out for a "knees on the carpet" session to keep Allah on side and a jewish person had nipped in and nicked her? I am trying to establish where in the spectrum of the sanctity of your own standards their behaviour would have been acceptable.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Everyone is different. If it was me I'd just tell them to piss off but she obviously couldn't take the worldwide public outing.Originally posted by d000hg View PostThe press are entitled to come knocking on your door if they want to ask you something, I think.Is facing up to what you've done "being driven to take your life"?Comment
-
It's different if you use someone's @ handle to include them in the conversation. That to me is trolling. She didn't do that and probably thought she was just conversing with like minded individuals on t'internet.Originally posted by tractor View PostDoes not compute!Comment
-
Originally posted by Batcher View PostEveryone is different. If it was me I'd just tell them to piss off but she obviously couldn't take the worldwide public outing.
Those people who like to point out the mote in others eyes, do not consider the beam within theirs.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Is it coz they is Kafflik??Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostSo if the reason is unimportant why did you add the bit about them socialising?
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Dodgy, their behaviour is inexcusable.
They are complicit through their neglect.
Whichever way you wish to dress this up or soften it by ridiculing me is up to you but you can't change the fact that due to their behaviour something has happened to Madeleine.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51

Comment