Originally posted by TheFaQQer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contractor dismissed over Body Tattoo's - the tattoo debate
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostOr they don't give a shit about what strangers think of tattoos.
I wouldn't choose to have a tattoo because I don't like them. My wife has several because she likes them - the only perception that matters is her own, not what the public think.I'm Spartacus.Comment
-
Some of the snobbery displayed here is frankly astonishing, especially from a community of geeks.Comment
-
Originally posted by Pondlife View PostPeople who have class don't care how other people look.
It's part of what gives them class.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Purely from a personal taste perspective 98% of the tattoo's I see on people are either downright unsightly or simply make me think that the person is another fashion victim that hasn't thought the long term consequences through.
Until about a decade back tattoo's were limited to the working class and rebel type images, since then there's been a massive jump in the fashion for having them done, now it's very common and spread to both genders. Not that long ago the only tattoo'd female would be an ex con or gang member.
I used to work with a bloke that had many tattoo's from when he was a miner and he hated them, but he'd been told that removal would have left him with arms and chest a mass of scars.
Does it seem snobby to ignore the current fashion that ink = good? Maybe, but I genuinely think most are unsightly, unimaginative, cheap and nasty and in the long run people are going to hate their "ink".
Since tattoo's are entirely self inflicted mutilations I've no objection to companies refusing to hire people with them (or a face full of piercings) and I don't see it as any kind of discrimination or breach of human rights. The tattoo'd person made their choice.Comment
-
Tattoo is a personal choice but as Tykemerc said, it is increasingly more popular.
What I don't understand is the increasing popularity of neck and facial tattoos.Comment
-
People who have tattoo's don't care if other people don't have them. The reverse clearly isn't true which is something I don't really get.
I can understand that if someone is defining themselves as "tattoo guy" then other people will form opinions but apart from that WGAS.
If a lady has a tattoo of a tortoise on her ass it's not going to influence my opinion of her in anyway (ex gf).
Samantha Cameron has one, George V, Edward VII, Churchill's mother and Prince Philip also AFAIK.Comment
-
Originally posted by quackhandle View PostIn the next ten years I'd say laser tattoo removal will be very lucrative. Time to reskill?
Apparently it paid significantly better than his old job which was a GP.
The majority of his customers were folks who'd got tattoos when they were young but ended up owning successful businesses.
Tattoos could be a hindrance when it came to getting into the best golf clubs and restaurants, apparently.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Originally posted by Eirikur View PostI've rejected applicants because they had visible tattoos during the interview.
tattoos are for the lowest of the lowest classes
There are some rather classy wimmin hereabouts sporting artistic tattoos.
They do tend to have the sense to put them where they can be covered up for work though.
But then again, it's not the UK.Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostThe local rag's story about it ends with
Mr Swales said: “We have high expectations of our employees.”
Looks like the client doesn't have much of an idea about the difference between contractors and employees.
Oh, hang on:
Consultant Jo Perkins was this week forced to leave Salisbury FM, the multi-million pound CMK company whose sole client is Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.
That would explain it
Put the lot of 'em down as disguised employees of HMRC!Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment