Hi all
Appreciate any advice and views on this.
I'm currently on assignment with a client that has on site parking for perm staff only. Although there is parking available, the client chooses to make parking for contractors available off site only.
There are no alternative parking sites available near client site, none that I could even choose to park at and pay for myself, as client site is not in business or retail area (location is a little isolated). Client site is also very poorly serviced by public transport. Client therefore lays on shuttle buses to 2 or 3 points to allow staff to connect to limited public transport. Majority of staff therefore drive and park.
Up until now, alternative parking site for contractors has resulted in extra travel time, but hasn't been too long so has been acceptable. Now client has given up lease on alternative parking site, and given contractors parking at a different alternative parking site, which is considerably further away. This adds an extra hour travel time every day to travel to and from this much further parking site. I will note again that there are no alternatives to parking near client, if there were, I would pay for parking to save the extra travel time. There is, however, parking on site, but the client refuses to make any spaces available to contractors.
What is your take on the extra travel time now being pushed onto contractors? This has been changed part way through contract when expectation on acceptance of contract was parking at closer site (and less travel time).
Appreciate any advice and views on this.
I'm currently on assignment with a client that has on site parking for perm staff only. Although there is parking available, the client chooses to make parking for contractors available off site only.
There are no alternative parking sites available near client site, none that I could even choose to park at and pay for myself, as client site is not in business or retail area (location is a little isolated). Client site is also very poorly serviced by public transport. Client therefore lays on shuttle buses to 2 or 3 points to allow staff to connect to limited public transport. Majority of staff therefore drive and park.
Up until now, alternative parking site for contractors has resulted in extra travel time, but hasn't been too long so has been acceptable. Now client has given up lease on alternative parking site, and given contractors parking at a different alternative parking site, which is considerably further away. This adds an extra hour travel time every day to travel to and from this much further parking site. I will note again that there are no alternatives to parking near client, if there were, I would pay for parking to save the extra travel time. There is, however, parking on site, but the client refuses to make any spaces available to contractors.
What is your take on the extra travel time now being pushed onto contractors? This has been changed part way through contract when expectation on acceptance of contract was parking at closer site (and less travel time).
Comment