You have a contract that requires you to work for another four weeks. But there is an expectation there that you'll be paid.
Windyanna says you would be expected to prove that repeated attempts to receive payment have failed This is so a judge can see that you've acted reasonably. But if a company has failed to pay your invoices, and continues to fail, then your expectation is that additional invoices would also go unpaid. So the question is : would a judge consider that you withdrawing your services until the payment issue is resolved, a reasonable act? I think he would. I think most people would agree you'd be a fool to continue to work for a company that's already badly in default.
So long as you're company is providing services to the client, I can't see how the client can do anything legally, but pay the agency (or the receiver). But I don't think in the circumstances you'd be obliged to work, given a significant risk that you won't be paid.
This is something you should discuss with a legal expert.
Windyanna says you would be expected to prove that repeated attempts to receive payment have failed This is so a judge can see that you've acted reasonably. But if a company has failed to pay your invoices, and continues to fail, then your expectation is that additional invoices would also go unpaid. So the question is : would a judge consider that you withdrawing your services until the payment issue is resolved, a reasonable act? I think he would. I think most people would agree you'd be a fool to continue to work for a company that's already badly in default.
So long as you're company is providing services to the client, I can't see how the client can do anything legally, but pay the agency (or the receiver). But I don't think in the circumstances you'd be obliged to work, given a significant risk that you won't be paid.
This is something you should discuss with a legal expert.
Comment