It's all the cases. I don't think most of the 14,000 people who have joined the PCG are all that interested in paying tax unnecesarily...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
PCG Sign Me UP
Collapse
X
-
-
Cheers. I was pretty certain of that. It really is a mindblowing statistic, and it was the one that convinced me that they are A GOOD THING.Originally posted by malvolioIt's all the cases. I don't think most of the 14,000 people who have joined the PCG are all that interested in paying tax unnecesarily...Comment
-
As an aside, my end client is one of the major global banks in Canary Wharf. Since I joined I have noticed new starters are being called 'upstairs' and being made to sign contracts between them (the contractor), the agency and the bank. From what I've heard they don't seem to be IR35 friendly to me (removing right to replacement etc.). It's a bit scary I think. I certainly wouldn't sign myself but it seems everyone is. I wonder if things like this might start to cause trouble in IR35 cases ...Originally posted by malvolioHowever the experts will not defend an unwinnable case, although we haven't had one of them yet. It's not a get out of jail free card, after all.Comment
-
I was not meaning to imply that I think QDOS are in any way dodgy - I was just implying that they are in the business of providing tax loss insuranceOriginally posted by LewisLook, I don't think QDOS are in any way 'dodgy' like you are sort of implying and I also think the PCG offering is good as well. I just think that chosing tax-loss insurance is not completely deluded that's all.
Comment
-
I see your pointOriginally posted by GonzoI was not meaning to imply that I think QDOS are in any way dodgy - I was just implying that they are in the business of providing tax loss insurance
Comment
-
Quick Dirty question - You can claim IR35 contract reviews as expenses right ?
I am thinking to review with Abbey ( 125 plus VAT) or Lawspeed ( 85 plus VAT ). Hum , 45 quid worth saving..Comment
-
If you think the contract might be IR35 friendly, then you might want to look at Qdos Freelancer Club. Membership is £35 and you get three reviews a year for that - they only give you a pass / fail indication though, I think.Originally posted by 2ukQuick Dirty question - You can claim IR35 contract reviews as expenses right ?
I am thinking to review with Abbey ( 125 plus VAT) or Lawspeed ( 85 plus VAT ). Hum , 45 quid worth saving..
Some contract checking services are better than others - are they just checking for IR35, or checking whether the contract is good to sign or not? Qdos were happy with a contract I sent them from an IR35 perspective, but there were other clauses I didn't like from a business perspective.Comment
-
How do they decide that its an unwinnable case. Do you have to get the contract checked for ir35 compliance from them or from external companies like bauercottrell etcOriginally posted by malvolioHowever the experts will not defend an unwinnable case, although we haven't had one of them yet. It's not a get out of jail free card, after all.Comment
-
Jeez. how many more times...
It's up to you to estabish the IR35edness or not of your contract, either by understanding the rules or by getting it assessed professionally. If you genuinely are in a disguised employee position and then ask Accountax (for example) to bail you out of IR35, Dave Smith will most likley tell you not to be so silly. If there is any doubt at all that you are inside, they will take it on and almost certainly win.
The PCG's advisors that provide this bit of the service are mostly ex-HMRC people and know the rules inside out and backwards. It won't take them long to spot an unwinnable case, but if it makes you fell any better, they haven't seen one yet...Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Just felt I should provide some clarification here!
As stated above, TLC35 covers all representation costs plus the tax, interest and penalties should your contract be deemed inside IR35.
However, we have recently redesigned our risk assessment procedure and there is no longer any stipulation for a contract review/assessment prior to cover being offered. Contractors can now register online and complete a short working and business practice questionnaire - if everything is ok the policy can be fully issued in minutes.
Obviously we still offer contract reviews at £85 or £35 depending on the level of detail required.Qdos Contractor - IR35 expertsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Today 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment