We’ve been told not to work ...take the time off ! They won’t pay us ...simple as that...
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Advice - no work to do, client sending me home
Collapse
X
-
-
It would be helpful if you gave a better title. You'll get advice no matter what so no need to ask. Give some better context in your title.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
-
There you go. They can do that and have done so no advice needed then.Originally posted by Cookielove View PostWe’ve been told not to work ...take the time off ! They won’t pay us ...simple as that...'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
In that case I'd expect to be paid or walk. Why accept an inside role but be treated as if outside? Stuff that. As for the other "contractor" - that's their business.Originally posted by Cookielove View PostCould be out for a few weeks...the role is inside IR35Comment
-
-
Because inside is a tax position only in theory. It's possible it has all the pillars of outside but the client is too scared. It could be it's all the same except RoS for example. So it's still a T&M contract and the client doesn't need T&M today. OP needs to check their contractor but I'd expect it to be broadly the same. Regardless of inside or outside it's still a T&M contract so you still get paid for a days work and don't for no work.Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
In that case I'd expect to be paid or walk. Why accept an inside role but be treated as if outside? Stuff that. As for the other "contractor" - that's their business.
I see what you are saying, and I'm sure many would agree but it's still all about the contract regardless of tax position.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
It’s an inside role..not sure where this came from?Originally posted by malvolio View PostSo you're not concerned about throwing away a solid outside IR35 position then...
Comment
-
Because you didn't make it clear.Originally posted by Cookielove View PostIt’s an inside role..not sure where this came from?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Today 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Yesterday 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59

Comment