• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

choosing inside and outside IR35

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    That's a silly attitude. Only people who don't have bills to pay or a healthy war chest truly have a choice in the matter.
    silly? We need to show foxtrot oscar to companies forcing IR35 on us via blanket bans

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by GitMaster69 View Post

      silly? We need to show foxtrot oscar to companies forcing IR35 on us via blanket bans
      Realistically all that's happening now is client's are exerting the control they mostly always had, and definitely always wanted.
      For years they've had to pay top dollar for prima-donna contractors, of whom only a few acted correctly. Now they aren't competing for outside contractors (that mostly never existed really) then can exert the control they always wanted.

      Shut up and code. B*tch...!

      NOTE. Blanket bans on PSCs is not the same as inside IR35. Or do you mean blanket determinations? (which are unlawful and uncommon as far as I'm aware).
      See You Next Tuesday

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by GitMaster69 View Post

        silly? We need to show foxtrot oscar to companies forcing IR35 on us via blanket bans
        Blanket ban isn’t inside IR35 - it’s a very different argument. Blanket bans occur because senior management don’t trust their staff not to screw things up.

        I really wish people would take the time to carefully pick their arguments.

        dave Chaplin is a prime example complaining that the FCSA is not doing something about holiday pay abuses in a company doing joint employment deals - when the FCSA is explicit that they only deal in their very narrow niches
        merely at clientco for the entertainment

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by GitMaster69 View Post

          silly? We need to show foxtrot oscar to companies forcing IR35 on us via blanket bans
          I wish people would get this bit right. Blanket ban is not inside IR35. Blanket ban on PSCs or blanket determination. It's pretty key.
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

            I wish people would get this bit right. Blanket ban is not inside IR35. Blanket ban on PSCs or blanket determination. It's pretty key.
            Blanket determination isn’t anything like a blanket ban on the use of PSCs

            and role based determinations are perfectly legal - it’s just global determinations that everyone is inside that aren’t.

            and then you have agents who don’t 100% know what’s going on and say the wrong thing

            either way there are a lot of things that may result in a contract being “inside” IR35 most of which will be because the contract is simply just additional staff (by another means) or because HMRC has scared the Finance / HR Director
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by eek View Post

              Blanket determination isn’t anything like a blanket ban on the use of PSCs

              and role based determinations are perfectly legal - it’s just global determinations that everyone is inside that aren’t.

              and then you have agents who don’t 100% know what’s going on and say the wrong thing

              either way there are a lot of things that may result in a contract being “inside” IR35 most of which will be because the contract is simply just additional staff (by another means) or because HMRC has scared the Finance / HR Director
              I know this. That's what I said? Just makes it very complex to discuss when people use completely the wrong phrase. Simes did it the other day and totally ruined whatever half decent argument he might have had.
              'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Lance View Post

                Realistically all that's happening now is client's are exerting the control they mostly always had, and definitely always wanted.
                For years they've had to pay top dollar for prima-donna contractors, of whom only a few acted correctly. Now they aren't competing for outside contractors (that mostly never existed really) then can exert the control they always wanted.

                Shut up and code. B*tch...!

                NOTE. Blanket bans on PSCs is not the same as inside IR35. Or do you mean blanket determinations? (which are unlawful and uncommon as far as I'm aware).
                blanket determinations uncommon? Have you been living under a rock? The entire financial industry did nothing but that.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by GitMaster69 View Post

                  blanket determinations uncommon? Have you been living under a rock? The entire financial industry did nothing but that.
                  sigh....

                  No. They have blanket banned PSCs...... They are not stupid enough to to blanket assessments as that's NOT LAWFUL.
                  See You Next Tuesday

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Lance View Post

                    sigh....

                    No. They have blanket banned PSCs...... They are not stupid enough to to blanket assessments as that's NOT LAWFUL.
                    sorry I miss the difference. Me as an "outside" contractor , having a business. Can I have financial client?

                    ....

                    NO

                    call it as you want blanket ban blanket or determination. The result is I can't work there as I will not abandon my business because they wish so

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by GitMaster69 View Post

                      sorry I miss the difference. Me as an "outside" contractor , having a business. Can I have financial client?

                      ....

                      NO

                      call it as you want blanket ban blanket or determination. The result is I can't work there as I will not abandon my business because they wish so
                      but you're missing the point. They won't engage with your LTD. That makes IR35 totally out of scope. You will be an employee of them, their agency, or an umbrella.
                      They're not asking you to abandon your company.
                      They want a member of staff. If that's not for you then fine. But there's bugger all you can do about it. They've made their choice.

                      Details are important if you ever want to be engaged an outside IR35 contractor ever again so pay attention to them.
                      See You Next Tuesday

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X