Hello all,
I don't often post on here, but I thought you guys would give will give some interesting insight into my current issue.
Well, I have been approached by a consultancy to work on a large programme for one of their end clients. It is remote with a small bit of travel.
Initial discussions on rate went ok. I quoted my rate and dropped a little amount to the "agreement" of the inhouse recruiter for consultancy. I interview, things go really well. Then recruiter calls me to ask me about my "expectations" on rate. They then go on to propose that perhaps they pay me a reduced rate for the first 3 months then increase to my quoted rate for the remainder of project.. I politely declined that suggestion citing that my rate was reasonable for an established holder of required skillset.
Is this complete BS? How would you handle? It seems like this recruiter is not that well versed with working with contractors, as that behaviour is something I experienced a lot in my permie days.
--
Secondly, I am a bit concerned that this kind of stuff is only the tip of the iceberg as it is a consultancy and I am largely a cost centre that they are making a margin on.
Is working for consultancies a bit crap and would I better off just finding a better client?
I know that typical recruitment agents make money in the same way, but it's a bit different I think. Let's not debate that here.
What you guys reckon?
My gut says no, but curious about your approach, given collective experience.
Thanks folks!
I don't often post on here, but I thought you guys would give will give some interesting insight into my current issue.
Well, I have been approached by a consultancy to work on a large programme for one of their end clients. It is remote with a small bit of travel.
Initial discussions on rate went ok. I quoted my rate and dropped a little amount to the "agreement" of the inhouse recruiter for consultancy. I interview, things go really well. Then recruiter calls me to ask me about my "expectations" on rate. They then go on to propose that perhaps they pay me a reduced rate for the first 3 months then increase to my quoted rate for the remainder of project.. I politely declined that suggestion citing that my rate was reasonable for an established holder of required skillset.
Is this complete BS? How would you handle? It seems like this recruiter is not that well versed with working with contractors, as that behaviour is something I experienced a lot in my permie days.
--
Secondly, I am a bit concerned that this kind of stuff is only the tip of the iceberg as it is a consultancy and I am largely a cost centre that they are making a margin on.
Is working for consultancies a bit crap and would I better off just finding a better client?
I know that typical recruitment agents make money in the same way, but it's a bit different I think. Let's not debate that here.
What you guys reckon?
My gut says no, but curious about your approach, given collective experience.
Thanks folks!
Comment