Starting a new project for a very high profile client - working through an agency, very IR35 friendly contract and (as far as the initial meeting went) very IR35 friendly working practices, too. Not worried about how its going to work in practice - a few weeks (at most) on site, then mostly remote. Essentially its a siloed consultancy / R&D role where I'll be given a list of requirements, will be investigating various tech stacks, then I'll be making suggestions, costing, prototyping and documenting my findings for them. It sounds like there will be regular breaks in the work, and I'll be doing work for my other clients along side theirs. There was even talk of ending the contract early due to budget.
I'll be working with global, mission critical, public facing systems that could potentially cause death (this is an important distinction from most of my other projects).
Just received a login to their "on boarding" systems with a ton of documents I need to sign before I can start. The wording is aimed at "contingent workers" - a term I've not come across before, but after doing a bit of research, it seems like a legitimate catch all term for either "temp employees" or "independent contractors" in the US. I'm working with a UK arm of theirs, but they are a very large American company - so I expect that's why its written with this language.
Documents I need to sign include:
* Conflict of interest (seems fine)
* Picture / audio / video consent (not happy with the full wording as it says they can use my "likeness" in any way they deem fit (which feels a little too much), though I'm fine with them using it for badges and within internal systems for ID etc)
* Drug policy (pretty hefty amount of text, no issues in principal, but a bit odd for an independent contractor)
* Acceptable use of technology (never seen this before)
* Another conflict of interest policy (much longer / more detailed than the first)
* Anti-harassment policy
* A few data privacy policies
* Code of business conduct policy (very much smacks of "employee")
Some of the documents are aimed at "employees" - though the definition of the word includes "as well as agency temps employed by a third party but assigned to perform work for us". Issue I have here is that I'm not a temp, I'm an independent contractor providing services through an employment business (the agency), which is reflected in the main contract.
I have the option to agree to individual policies - i.e. I can leave some out, though I expect that will nerf the job.
I very rarely get asked to sign additional documents for my contracts - usually NDAs, Health & Safety agreements for when I visit sites and badge / photo releases - which I'm perfectly fine with as one would expect, but this seems like a full-on employee on-boarding process. I am conflicted because of the pure scale of the contract and the risk the work I'll be doing could potentially pose to the public.
I've seen this kind of thing once or twice before, usually when I've taken contracts with the public sector or with private companies servicing the public sector.
Advice? Being too cautious? This one for a solicitor?
I'll be working with global, mission critical, public facing systems that could potentially cause death (this is an important distinction from most of my other projects).
Just received a login to their "on boarding" systems with a ton of documents I need to sign before I can start. The wording is aimed at "contingent workers" - a term I've not come across before, but after doing a bit of research, it seems like a legitimate catch all term for either "temp employees" or "independent contractors" in the US. I'm working with a UK arm of theirs, but they are a very large American company - so I expect that's why its written with this language.
Documents I need to sign include:
* Conflict of interest (seems fine)
* Picture / audio / video consent (not happy with the full wording as it says they can use my "likeness" in any way they deem fit (which feels a little too much), though I'm fine with them using it for badges and within internal systems for ID etc)
* Drug policy (pretty hefty amount of text, no issues in principal, but a bit odd for an independent contractor)
* Acceptable use of technology (never seen this before)
* Another conflict of interest policy (much longer / more detailed than the first)
* Anti-harassment policy
* A few data privacy policies
* Code of business conduct policy (very much smacks of "employee")
Some of the documents are aimed at "employees" - though the definition of the word includes "as well as agency temps employed by a third party but assigned to perform work for us". Issue I have here is that I'm not a temp, I'm an independent contractor providing services through an employment business (the agency), which is reflected in the main contract.
I have the option to agree to individual policies - i.e. I can leave some out, though I expect that will nerf the job.
I very rarely get asked to sign additional documents for my contracts - usually NDAs, Health & Safety agreements for when I visit sites and badge / photo releases - which I'm perfectly fine with as one would expect, but this seems like a full-on employee on-boarding process. I am conflicted because of the pure scale of the contract and the risk the work I'll be doing could potentially pose to the public.
I've seen this kind of thing once or twice before, usually when I've taken contracts with the public sector or with private companies servicing the public sector.
Advice? Being too cautious? This one for a solicitor?
Comment