Originally posted by willendure
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
State of the Market
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by SchumiStars View PostQuite an odd going today.
An interview was arranged for today by a recruitment agent. We had been chatting via LinkedIn mostly (RedFlag#1).
Interview was for a defence company, 2 people from the company asking me questions and having a chat about tech.
Was a positive interview and immediately contacted the agent. I searched for the company phone number (Not present) or his email and still not much found (RedFlag#2). So using his linked, I sent him a message. He replied back 30mins latter (RedFlag#3) saying he was in a meeting and call me back after (RedFlag#4).
Of course he never phoned me back which seems very odd (RedFlag#5).
Most agents normally phone to get an assesment from me within 30mins so this does feel all a bit wrong. Coupled by the fact I asked for his phone number and never responded.
Now I am wondering whether his professional looking website might be a front hiding themselves in a far away place.
All very odd.Comment
-
Originally posted by avonleigh View Post
Wouldn't advise contacting client direct. Looks unprofessional if there is an agent. Think you are reading too much into this. Agents don't always ask for feedback. Mostly they do but I have had some that are not communicative at all. Particularly nowadays. Got a couple of gigs when I thought I was being ghosted.Comment
-
Originally posted by Smartie View PostThe last time I found myself with obsolete dev skills was after a four year contract in 2002 (Lotus Notes/Domino/javascript etc.).
Decided I didn't want to end up in that position again so took a break then re-invented myself as a pure BA (as I already had the skills) and later added PM then Agile stuff.
Worked out pretty well - if you don't mind business facing roles, there isn't the same need to constantly learn new tech since methodologies and approaches don't change quickly for these.
AI is likely to come for the Devs first I suspect.Originally posted by oliverson View Post
Not in 2025 it doesn't. In fact it seems very NORMAL.
There is far too much competition ATM. And unless you like banging your head against a brick wall I find it better to do something else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SchumiStars View Post
I tend not to chase agents TBF. He may also have another 10 candidates in the same process at the same company.
There is far too much competition ATM. And unless you like banging your head against a brick wall I find it better to do something else.
Right now there's probably a whole stream of candidates chasing far too little work and the agent doesn't need to call you back unless you are selected.Comment
-
Just heard back.
copied and pasted:
Unfortunately not good news as they cannot move forward with the Technical lead role, would have been potentially gone through for the Senior Engineer role but annoyingly was cancelled.
All from a message via linkedIn.
lol, lovely way to start the weekend.Comment
-
One for the younger generation? Job title is "Snowflake Developer"
https://www.jobserve.com/gb/en/FastT...A60F880737021EComment
-
Originally posted by SchumiStars View PostJust heard back.
copied and pasted:
Unfortunately not good news as they cannot move forward with the Technical lead role, would have been potentially gone through for the Senior Engineer role but annoyingly was cancelled.
All from a message via linkedIn.
lol, lovely way to start the weekend.Comment
-
Originally posted by SchumiStars View PostJust heard back.
copied and pasted:
Unfortunately not good news as they cannot move forward with the Technical lead role, would have been potentially gone through for the Senior Engineer role but annoyingly was cancelled.
All from a message via linkedIn.
lol, lovely way to start the weekend.Comment
-
Originally posted by willendure View Post
So they interviewed you with 2 roles in mind, neither of which actually exist.
You can either play the middle ground for both roles or opt to focus on one. I usually go for the most technical as thats were my skills are.
I really don't know what else I could have done in this case. As I said and judging by the feedback, the technicals aligned. Its usually easier to go from a tech role to a leadership role.
...so again....looks like I have fallen through the cracks. I do have a hard time, believing there are better candadates than me though
Leaves me more time for dong sports.Last edited by SchumiStars; 14 June 2025, 20:47.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Today 09:53
- Labour decommissions Freelance Commissioner idea Yesterday 08:56
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 22:44
- Is it legal to work remotely from Europe via a UK company? Sep 5 10:44
- Autumn Budget 2025 set for Nov 26, ‘putting contractors on watch’ Sep 4 15:13
- November 2025 Companies House ID rules contractors must follow Sep 3 19:12
- When agencies sink with your contractor invoice: a legal guide Sep 2 17:14
- Reeves ‘to raise VAT registration threshold to £100,000’ Sep 1 06:37
- When your agency shuts: a recruiter’s 5 tips if you’re unpaid Aug 29 06:57
- What the 2025 employment status review means for contractors Aug 28 06:39
Comment