Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
He, along with OG and a few of the other vociferous Bremain community have slowly drifted away from the scene as their hysterical posturing has been shown to be well wide of the mark.
Only the uber-muttonheads like sas and darmy are left, hanging around like a bad smell whilst feverishly wiping froth from their screens trying to justify an ever-dwindling strand of logic.
And yet I want hard Brexit.
I'm not clear what you want.
Never put all your eggs in one basket.
I am match fit for Brexit, I doubt anything much will change if it's soft.
But a hard one will cause chaos and chaos is good for people with some capital
I think it is when a government bails out banks. Private sector debt becomes public - the money from the bailout doesn't really exist anywhere (perhaps money-printing was the wrong word, that's more QE, let's call it money creation)
Cameron had a deal whereby we were out of the EU politically, in perpuity.
But still had a say in the EU.
And that would have been signed in treaty.
I expect he did. And, much like your post, he had not really checked the small print or even the
In fact what he had managed to "negotiate" for us was the equivalent of a food convoy turning up to Aleppo with a small box of out-of-date crisps and a couple of bottles of flat Cola.
No doubt that impressed the pants off a simpleton like you, but the more discerning voter saw it for what it was. Worthless.
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”
Comment