• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What is the best way to take money out from the company bank account?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
    I've done this on my accountants adviCe. (one of the biggest contractor accountants also posting on this forum)
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View Post
      There is no problem at all in gifting shares to your spouse and sharing dividends, provided you are married when the transfer takes place and the shares hold full voting rights (so are not purely a right to income).

      If you're not married when you gift the shares or they are non-voting shares, you have a massive problem should HMRC come looking.
      Also seems grossly unfair, I've been living with my partner for 13 years as man and wife, longer than I was married previously!

      Yet I can't avail of this!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by stek View Post
        Also seems grossly unfair, I've been living with my partner for 13 years as man and wife, longer than I was married previously!

        Yet I can't avail of this!
        It's not unusual though - you're also not on an equal footing when it comes to inheritance tax, the older married persons tax code etc. It's one of the exceptionally daft ways that the Government try to encourage marriage, and penalise anyone that doesn't want to get married.

        You could just marry her of course. If you then gave her shares you'd save in tax the amount it costs for an awesome honeymoon. Just don't say "will you marry me for tax reasons darling"
        ContractorUK Best Forum Adviser 2013

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by stek View Post
          Also seems grossly unfair, I've been living with my partner for 13 years as man and wife, longer than I was married previously!

          Yet I can't avail of this!
          Best Forum Advisor 2014
          Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
          Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View Post
            It's not unusual though - you're also not on an equal footing when it comes to inheritance tax, the older married persons tax code etc. It's one of the exceptionally daft ways that the Government try to encourage marriage, and penalise anyone that doesn't want to get married.

            You could just marry her of course. If you then gave her shares you'd save in tax the amount it costs for an awesome honeymoon. Just don't say "will you marry me for tax reasons darling"
            Can't his bird just buy a share of the business?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
              Can't his bird just buy a share of the business?
              If she bought for market value on genuine commercial terms, on an arms length basis, then yes. But that could be expensive if the company has a long contract in place and therefore guaranteed future income of a certain level or a lot of assets. Plus if she's buying the shares from him he'll have a capital gain to pay tax on as presumably he bought the shares at par (£1 each on incorp).

              If not, it's a Settlement.
              ContractorUK Best Forum Adviser 2013

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View Post
                If she bought for market value on genuine commercial terms, on an arms length basis, then yes.
                What Clare says is correct, but it is almost impossible to place an accurate market value on the shares of a one person contractor company for so many reasons.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Martin at NixonWilliams View Post
                  What Clare says is correct, but it is almost impossible to place an accurate market value on the shares of a one person contractor company for so many reasons.
                  Great, she can have half for a quid!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by stek View Post
                    Great, she can have half for a quid!
                    If you can honestly say that you'd also sell half your company to me for the same value, then go for it.

                    My £1 is in the post
                    ContractorUK Best Forum Adviser 2013

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                      kesm has a boyfriend, so not really an option (without lots of careful thought and planning, before TCP comes along)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X