• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - the road to Judicial Review

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by ROBIN REDBREAST View Post
    Has anyone spoken to MontP about this and established who will be representing us - will it be the same gents hwo did us proud at the original JR request meeting?
    Yes, it's the same team.

    Do we know what "dirt" we will be presenting to the JR and under what basis? Call me a pessimist but can you honestly se ethe govermnet allowing us to win this....!??
    I am aware of most of the arguments, but for obvious reasons don't want to say anything here.

    The Government & HMRC have been defeated in the Courts many times before, so this is no different.

    Personally, I don't think HMRC have got a leg to stand on.

    Comment


      Attendance at the JR

      IMO, everyone who can attend should go, even if we can't all get in or have to take turns in shifts.

      Over 50 people responded to the JCHR survey saying they faced the prospect of losing their home or bankruptcy. It would look odd if no-one bothered showing up for a hearing that could decide their family's future.

      Comment


        Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
        If you start a thread in general or PM me I will try to help. As you say, best to keep this thread clean.
        It was just a bit of a rant really, just about the retrospective nature of the CSA rules. Everybody who goes through it will have their own unpleasant story. I think it was you who said "you don't know who you married until you get divorced" - wise words indeed!

        Comment


          Collage

          Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
          IMO, everyone who can attend should go, even if we can't all get in or have to take turns in shifts.

          Over 50 people responded to the JCHR survey saying they faced the prospect of losing their home or bankruptcy. It would look odd if no-one bothered showing up for a hearing that could decide their family's future.
          DR, go one better. If everyone can email or post to a website a picture of themselves then we could have a collage propped up at the back of the court. I think 2000 pics on a big 6' x 8' board would grab the attention of the court. And I think it could not be refused on the basis that the collage is there to represent all those who cannot attend due to the size of the court room and are indirectly, the defendents.

          Could headline it - "Real people, Real lives, Unreal future"

          Comment


            Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
            IMO, everyone who can attend should go, even if we can't all get in or have to take turns in shifts.

            Over 50 people responded to the JCHR survey saying they faced the prospect of losing their home or bankruptcy. It would look odd if no-one bothered showing up for a hearing that could decide their family's future.
            I may well be in the area then - but wouldn't go since my interest is purely as an observer and it would be unfair to take the seat of somebody who is directly affected. But do please try and let me know which boozer you'll be in afterwards. If I can make it I will.

            Comment


              A war chest

              [QUOTE=Tax_shouldnt_be_taxing;997944]DR, go one better. If everyone can email or post to a website a picture of themselves then we could have a collage propped up at the back of the court.

              It makes sense to have a pool of money to be able to make the most of our day in court - be it collage, banners etc. Its up to us to show the human element. I would be happy to contribute say £100 (more even) to be used for this type of awareness program. What does everybody think? My tax bill is probably about £250K so like everybody else - my future is being decided.

              Comment


                Calling all expectant mothers

                If there are any expectant mothers out there, directly or indirectly affected by this, then it would be great if you could attend the JR.

                We don't just want a load of affluent looking city types in suits.

                PS. actually, the more women in general who attend the better.
                Last edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 11 November 2009, 15:09. Reason: PS

                Comment


                  Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                  If there are any expectant mothers out there, directly or indirectly affected by this, then it would be great if you could attend the JR.

                  We don't just want a load of affluent looking city types in suits.

                  PS. actually, the more women in general who attend the better.
                  At point of the hearing I will be 7 months pregnant. Hugely impacted. It is very real for me and my whole family. I definitely plan to be there.

                  Reckon Hector will give up his seat for me? Somehow I think I know the answer to that......
                  Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                  http://notoretrotax.org.uk

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Fog View Post
                    At point of the hearing I will be 7 months pregnant. Hugely impacted. It is very real for me and my whole family. I definitely plan to be there.

                    Reckon Hector will give up his seat for me? Somehow I think I know the answer to that......
                    Excellent, and congratulations by the way.

                    Perhaps you could pretend to go into labour during the proceedings for added effect. You could say it was brought on by Hector's barefaced lies.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by ASB View Post
                      I may well be in the area then - but wouldn't go since my interest is purely as an observer and it would be unfair to take the seat of somebody who is directly affected. But do please try and let me know which boozer you'll be in afterwards. If I can make it I will.
                      There's a pub opposite the law courts called The George. Its hard to think we could make it as a group any further. Took a while to escape last time.
                      Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                      "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X