Originally posted by HMRCAreCrooks
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
HMRC agreement to DTA
Did we ever establish if anyone has a letter from HMRC closing off enquiries or not opening up enquiries even when the DTA information had been included on Self Assessment returns.Comment
-
Originally posted by poppy01 View Postactually, no we don't. which is why there should indeed be no negotiation.... from us.Comment
-
Originally posted by seadog View PostDid we ever establish if anyone has a letter from HMRC closing off enquiries or not opening up enquiries even when the DTA information had been included on Self Assessment returns.
We know that a few people have not had enquiries opened but these people will be reluctant to step forward for fear of "discovery assessments".
We know of many others who have had enquiries opened after the 12 month deadline has passed. (HMRC breaking their own rules!)
There are no contractors in the Montpelier scheme who have had enquiries closed. If there are people this has happened to (and WG seems to know there are), then I think they must be property developers.
I submitted the following Freedom of Information request to HMRC on 29th January and am waiting for a response:
This FOI request concerns the scheme closed retrospectively by Section 58, Finance Act 2008.
It is known that some taxpayers who used the scheme had their enquiries closed by HMRC and gained a tax advantage. Can HMRC provide a report on this, including:
1) the number of users who benefited from this tax advantage
2) the number of enquiries that were closed where there was no additional tax to pay
3) a breakdown of the financial value to the users of this tax advantage
4) the total cost to the Exchequer of providing this tax advantageComment
-
-
Originally posted by HMRCAreCrooks View PostI agree. I am just wondering if people, in their initial reactions, had a conversation with the HMRC when all of this business started, and thus whether they also discussed any negotiations. I myself had a conversation with one of the HMRC lot and I remember how he sounded like a car salesman, or some other dodgy dealer. He spent the majority of the conversation telling me how much the interest is, how long these things drag on, how in many many cases peoples final interest bill is much greater than the original bill...."better to pay up now and be done with it" he said. "And there is no negotiation sir, you owe use the tax."Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostThat FOI request seems incredibly damning to HMRC....!!
I am expecting them to reply something along the lines "we don't keep this information".
But my response to that will be "here's the name of a manwho has it at his fingertips".
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostSounds like the police. They will tell you any old lies to get a conviction.
Comment
-
BN66 - solution ?
I'm sure this has been raised before but I can't find a mention of it.
These chaps seem to be offoering a solution but, being slightly dim, I'm not sure I really understand
http://www.bn66.co.uk/bn66-solution-...-questions.htm
Has anyone got any opinions on it ?Comment
-
Hello all
According to HMRC's own T&C's for SA tax enquiries we have had the right to take the enquiry to the tax commisioners ourselves. We could have done this based on saying that holding an enquiry open for 6+years is unreasonable and putting in a complaint.
Any one any thoughts on why MP havnt done this and or is this still an option, it would have to be some one brave though.
It would bring matters to a head !
FishermanComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Today 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment