• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back: Continued

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    A small part of my potential exposure was to be serviced by a PEP/ISA type thing but that has taken a hammering in recent weeks. Uh oh......

    Comment


      Originally posted by TheGadgetMan View Post
      yes...the FSA protection is 35K...for joint accounts, you have 35k each...that is, 70k...

      well, thats what it said in the Daily Mail this morning, so it must be true!

      well - i asked the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) another possibly more poigant question - if you have 150k mortgage offset by 150k (so net 0) and the lender goes down - are you net zero or do they give you the 70k thats protected and then only give you back the whatever in the pound for the extra 80k (so do they treat the debit and credit separately) and the answer was ....

      ' The position of building societies and banks is not the same under insolvency law, so that automatic set off may not apply on the insolvency of the building society, whereas it would be automatic on the insolvency of a bank.'

      i actually have a longer answer if anyone wants me to post it .... but not the answer i expected. I then rang my lemder (Coventry) and got told twoce that the netting would not happen and once that it woudl - so I have no idea

      Comment


        Originally posted by elpinar View Post
        well - i asked the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) another possibly more poigant question - if you have 150k mortgage offset by 150k (so net 0) and the lender goes down - are you net zero or do they give you the 70k thats protected and then only give you back the whatever in the pound for the extra 80k (so do they treat the debit and credit separately) and the answer was ....

        ' The position of building societies and banks is not the same under insolvency law, so that automatic set off may not apply on the insolvency of the building society, whereas it would be automatic on the insolvency of a bank.'

        i actually have a longer answer if anyone wants me to post it .... but not the answer i expected. I then rang my lemder (Coventry) and got told twoce that the netting would not happen and once that it woudl - so I have no idea
        Netting is a massive subject that the banking and investment banking industries have been trying to resolve for years. The short answer is very simple. If your terms of business do not state it do not rely on it. In the event that a liquidator is called he will "cherry pick" what he settles and does not settle. In short he will call in your mortgage (if he cannot sell it - in this marketplace unlikely) whilst making you an unsecured creditor for your offset accounts. Your only protection will be the £35k/£70k.

        Check your wording and seek clarification in writing.
        Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
        "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

        Comment


          Judging by the recent postings I think I'm getting an answer to my question whether or not it is good idea to redeem the offset mortgage or not.

          Comment


            I think HMRC better get their skates on. If the financial situation gets much worse we might not have any assets left to collect!

            Comment


              Originally posted by Hawkwind View Post
              Judging by the recent postings I think I'm getting an answer to my question whether or not it is good idea to redeem the offset mortgage or not.
              I think the answer is - is you have an offset mortgage vs ctd - you cant loose your money in a ctd (as it were) but you could in an offset mortgage UNLESS your offset mortgage is with a bank in whcih case byu law they will net. So anyone wiht an offset moetgage over 35/70k is taking a risk

              Comment


                Originally posted by elpinar View Post
                I think the answer is - is you have an offset mortgage vs ctd - you cant loose your money in a ctd (as it were) but you could in an offset mortgage UNLESS your offset mortgage is with a bank in whcih case byu law they will net. So anyone wiht an offset moetgage over 35/70k is taking a risk
                Found this link - it appears that not even the FSCS are sure of the position...

                http://www.fool.co.uk/news/property-...mortgages.aspx

                Again, look at the terms of your contract. Some will work but some won't.
                Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                Comment


                  Jeez...this is getting too complicated for my tiny brain to deal with...

                  ...my offset mortgage is with Intelligent Finance...I'm sending my money off for my CTD tomorrow morning...

                  my money is safer in a CTD with HMRC, isn't it?...please tell me its so...?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by TheGadgetMan View Post
                    Jeez...this is getting too complicated for my tiny brain to deal with...

                    ...my offset mortgage is with Intelligent Finance...I'm sending my money off for my CTD tomorrow morning...

                    my money is safer in a CTD with HMRC, isn't it?...please tell me its so...?
                    A CTD (like National Savings or Gilts) is safer than having your money in a bank or building society.

                    I've got a savings account with Intelligent Finance (owned by HBOS ) but the amount is below the £35k safety net.

                    As an aside, it's quite funny how risk averse we all seem to be and yet we joined a scheme like MTM.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                      As an aside, it's quite funny how risk averse we all seem to be and yet we joined a scheme like MTM.
                      That irony hadn't missed me.

                      Slightly daft really since i nearly joined MontP some years ago and didn't, but in other matters I'm a bit of a risk taker.

                      As you said if HMRC don't pull their fingers out it's possible that some of their targets won't have any appreciable assets for them to target in the current climate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X