Originally posted by helen7
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back: Continued
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by elpinar View PostIs this true even if they are appealed against ? thought that put all this on hold .... plus...... if you have a ctd no interst is accruting ... what do they call these 5%?Comment
-
I've now received details of four amended tax returns for 2003-2006, I presume these are closure notices, three just say that I had omitted my partnership income and show my updated calculations.
One thing that confuses me is that it states:-
Your return is amended as follows:
Your SA before enq was X tax was due.
My Amedment results in a Y increase in tax due.
The ammended SA is now X+Y Due.
And then at the bottom of the letter it has a figure showing the total now due on my SA Account. However this figure seems to include all of the X figures from above which I'm guessing I have already paid!?
Also the letter for year ending 2003 is in a different format to the other three!
I've forwarded them all to MP, but does somebody have the correct phone number for NW/TQ?Comment
-
Originally posted by HalfMonkey View PostMP submitted an appeal against my closure notices recently. Should I receive any confirmation/feedback from HMRC?Comment
-
Originally posted by Oakleyacc View PostSomeone in this thread said that over 100 closure notices have been received and that MP were appealing. I don't know if enough time has passed yet, but does anyone know what (if any) response there's been to the appeals?
It would be interesting to know as I understood that HMRC would be rejecting appeals against these notices.
They would have to go to commissioners to issue jeporady assessments. This is unlikely.Comment
-
Originally posted by helen7 View PostOn the letter with my closure notice it stated that if I do not pay within 30 days they will add a further 5%
If I do not pay after 6 months another 5% will be added.
In my eyes, that is a penalty.
the 5% kicks in 30 days after the due date which would be after the appeals process exhausted.
I really would prefer it if you PMed myself or DonkeyRhubarb as you come across as a s**t stirring troll. Personally I would prefer it to be DR - though I bet he would prefer it if it was me!!Comment
-
Originally posted by elpinar View PostIs this true even if they are appealed against ? thought that put all this on hold .... plus...... if you have a ctd no interst is accruting ... what do they call these 5%?Comment
-
Originally posted by harrinp1 View PostI've now received details of four amended tax returns for 2003-2006, I presume these are closure notices, three just say that I had omitted my partnership income and show my updated calculations.
One thing that confuses me is that it states:-
Your return is amended as follows:
Your SA before enq was X tax was due.
My Amedment results in a Y increase in tax due.
The ammended SA is now X+Y Due.
And then at the bottom of the letter it has a figure showing the total now due on my SA Account. However this figure seems to include all of the X figures from above which I'm guessing I have already paid!?
Also the letter for year ending 2003 is in a different format to the other three!
I've forwarded them all to MP, but does somebody have the correct phone number for NW/TQ?
I will ask admin if they can upgrade you account to allow PMs.
BPComment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThere are some who have found that by sending me a PM they get a response!
I will ask admin if they can upgrade you account to allow PMs.
BPComment
-
Originally posted by helen7 View PostOn the letter with my closure notice it stated that if I do not pay within 30 days they will add a further 5%
If I do not pay after 6 months another 5% will be added.
In my eyes, that is a penalty.
"Any tax which is payable as a result of this letter should be paid within 30 days of the date you receive this notice. A 5% surcharge will be imposed on any tax which is unpaid more than 28 days after this. And an additional 5% surcharge will also be imposed on any tax which is still unpaid more than 6 months after it was due.
You have the right to appeal...
At the same time you can ask to postpone payment of any tax you think is overcharged until your appeal is settled."
I received my CN 6 days after date on letter. On that basis first surcharge would be payable 6 + 30 + 28 = 64 days after the date of HMRC notice. However, by appealing, and requesting postponement at the same time, the surcharges get lost too.
A mate, also a member here, just 7 days after receipt of the CNs received a "Notice Warning of Legal Proceedings which went:
You must make payment in full by x date (where x date was 22 days after the date of the CNs!!!)
If you do not I will start distraint action against you. This means that I will seize your possessions and later arrange to have them sold at public auction. The proceeds from the sale will be set against the debt and the costs of the action.
Err. Letter 2 seems to take away the rights conferred in letter 1?
BTW, mate was last seen gazing at the inside of an empty bottle behind the barricades.Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
"Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECDComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Today 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Yesterday 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
Comment