Originally posted by BolshieBastard
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back: Continued
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
But even then, HMRC can get access to that by intimating to be an affected contractor.
I agree, there is no 100% secure way of doing this. I wouldn't be surprised if the circulars that MontP send us find their way into the hands of Hector. After all, there's bound to be at least one or two disgruntled clients out there who have already settled who may not want the rest of us to win.
A "private" forum may lull us into a false sense of security.Comment
-
Originally posted by Emigre View PostSurely HMRC aren't such lying cheating fiends as to hold themselves out to be someone that they are not? Isn't that illegal?
I wish I could comment on the illegal bit! I will PM you!Comment
-
Originally posted by Emigre View PostSurely HMRC aren't such lying cheating fiends as to hold themselves out to be someone that they are not? Isn't that illegal?
Both the Dept of Work and Pensions and HMRC use what are termed 'special investigators.' These are civil servants whose job it is to investigate suspected 'wrong doings' to claim benefits or avoid paying taxes etc.
They may go undercover or use cover stories to gather evidence. If they do speak to you formally in any investigation, they must quote you what are called 'judges rules.' You know the 'Anything you say can and will be taken down ..........' etc, etc.
Sadly, its perfectly legit.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostEr, you never heard of under cover cops?
Both the Dept of Work and Pensions and HMRC use what are termed 'special investigators.' These are civil servants whose job it is to investigate suspected 'wrong doings' to claim benefits or avoid paying taxes etc.
They may go undercover or use cover stories to gather evidence. If they do speak to you formally in any investigation, they must quote you what are called 'judges rules.' You know the 'Anything you say can and will be taken down ..........' etc, etc.
Sadly, its perfectly legit.Comment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostEr, you never heard of under cover cops?
Both the Dept of Work and Pensions and HMRC use what are termed 'special investigators.' These are civil servants whose job it is to investigate suspected 'wrong doings' to claim benefits or avoid paying taxes etc.
They may go undercover or use cover stories to gather evidence. If they do speak to you formally in any investigation, they must quote you what are called 'judges rules.' You know the 'Anything you say can and will be taken down ..........' etc, etc.
Think about it – if he was genuine and hadn’t yet been carted off to the funny farm, would he really be posting such drivel on a public board?Comment
-
Originally posted by Gooner99 View PostIt seems obvious to me that Brillo is Hector. It’s an age-old technique – repeatedly spouting off about what a nutter you are and what lengths you are prepared to go to, and then add credibility by dropping in the names of other anarchic organisations that you are involved with. The intention is to draw in and identify those of a similar disposition. Unfortunately, poor Poppy (amongst others) swallowed it.
Think about it – if he was genuine and hadn’t yet been carted off to the funny farm, would he really be posting such drivel on a public board?
One Sunday afternoon recently, when I had nothing better to do, I was able to find out a fair amount about Scourer - more than he thinks I know, but all found out using information in his posts on CUK and a bit of Googling. {EDIT: I think I'll remove this sentence.}
If he's undercover, he's absolutely crap at itComment
-
Originally posted by Gooner99 View PostIt seems obvious to me that Brillo is Hector. It’s an age-old technique – repeatedly spouting off about what a nutter you are and what lengths you are prepared to go to, and then add credibility by dropping in the names of other anarchic organisations that you are involved with. The intention is to draw in and identify those of a similar disposition. Unfortunately, poor Poppy (amongst others) swallowed it.
Think about it – if he was genuine and hadn’t yet been carted off to the funny farm, would he really be posting such drivel on a public board?Comment
-
Originally posted by Gooner99 View PostIt seems obvious to me that Brillo is Hector. It’s an age-old technique – repeatedly spouting off about what a nutter you are and what lengths you are prepared to go to, and then add credibility by dropping in the names of other anarchic organisations that you are involved with. The intention is to draw in and identify those of a similar disposition. Unfortunately, poor Poppy (amongst others) swallowed it.
Think about it – if he was genuine and hadn’t yet been carted off to the funny farm, would he really be posting such drivel on a public board?
There are several on this thread and at montpelier who know who I am and I have exchanged many PMs, emails, phone calls and even met some of them.
They also know I am a total nutcase. Except relative to gooner - he makes me look sane.Comment
-
Originally Posted by Gooner99 View Post
It seems obvious to me that Brillo is Hector. It’s an age-old technique – repeatedly spouting off about what a nutter you are and what lengths you are prepared to go to, and then add credibility by dropping in the names of other anarchic organisations that you are involved with. The intention is to draw in and identify those of a similar disposition. Unfortunately, poor Poppy (amongst others) swallowed it.
Think about it – if he was genuine and hadn’t yet been carted off to the funny farm, would he really be posting such drivel on a public board?
I know Brillo, and I can assure you he is no Hector spy
RAOFLMAOConfusion is a natural state of beingComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Today 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Yesterday 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
Comment