• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Holiday pay claim

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Holiday pay claim

    Hi all, I am pursuing a claim from my umbrella agency company for unpaid holiday pay (as unlawful deductions from wages) which has led me to an employment tribunal hearing now scheduled for September this year. When I received my payments (within IR35 on payroll) I assumed that holiday pay was included within my payments but it seems not as I was not told when I joined that I needed to fill in a form for each day off to be paid my holiday (rather than recording it on my timesheet). As a result I missed out on being paid 2 years' worth of payments for holiday pay and have claimed it back, but they are refusing to pay. Silly me one might say, but it just doesn't seem equitable that I wasn't paid what I had earned, because of a form and a process that I was never told of - has anyone else come across this?

    In every other employment I have had, holiday pay is just included within normal earnings.

    #2
    Good for you, I hope you get your money. Some of these umbrellas are crooks when it comes to holiday pay.

    Let us know how you get on.
    "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
    - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by AliGrm View Post
      Hi all, I am pursuing a claim from my umbrella agency company for unpaid holiday pay (as unlawful deductions from wages) which has led me to an employment tribunal hearing now scheduled for September this year. When I received my payments (within IR35 on payroll) I assumed that holiday pay was included within my payments but it seems not as I was not told when I joined that I needed to fill in a form for each day off to be paid my holiday (rather than recording it on my timesheet). As a result I missed out on being paid 2 years' worth of payments for holiday pay and have claimed it back, but they are refusing to pay. Silly me one might say, but it just doesn't seem equitable that I wasn't paid what I had earned, because of a form and a process that I was never told of - has anyone else come across this?

      In every other employment I have had, holiday pay is just included within normal earnings.
      This isn't 'normal employment'. It's weird arrangement with a 3rd party to appears the tax man and it under fire from various sides for different reasons. Holiday pay being one of them.

      Can you tell us what the explaination from the brolly for not paying it is? Is the brolly FCSA registered?

      I don't really understand that explaination of the situation but is this a case of agency workers being pushed in to unscupulous umbrellas that Cojak (I think) has posted about or is this a situation of a highly paid skilled contractor having to use an approved umbrella from FCSA?

      Ah. It was Cojak in this thread, which the OP might want to read. https://forums.contractoruk.com/umbr...a-threads.html

      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

      Comment


        #4
        To the OP. We've got a lot of threads on holiday pay. You might want to read through them and see if any seem similar to your situation. It might give you some answers and if you can show us which one it is we might be able to comment further on your situation.,

        https://www.google.com/search?q=holi...hrome&ie=UTF-8

        If it is an FCSA registered company this thread might be a useful start https://forums.contractoruk.com/umbr...day-pay-2.html

        But have a read through the rest and see if anything rings as similar to your situation.
        Last edited by northernladuk; 28 August 2021, 20:53.
        'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AliGrm View Post
          Hi all, I am pursuing a claim from my umbrella agency company for unpaid holiday pay (as unlawful deductions from wages) which has led me to an employment tribunal hearing now scheduled for September this year. When I received my payments (within IR35 on payroll) I assumed that holiday pay was included within my payments but it seems not as I was not told when I joined that I needed to fill in a form for each day off to be paid my holiday (rather than recording it on my timesheet). As a result I missed out on being paid 2 years' worth of payments for holiday pay and have claimed it back, but they are refusing to pay. Silly me one might say, but it just doesn't seem equitable that I wasn't paid what I had earned, because of a form and a process that I was never told of - has anyone else come across this?

          In every other employment I have had, holiday pay is just included within normal earnings.
          Right some actual advice (not in any real order as there is a ton of it).
          1) Would you be good enough to name your umbrella - that would make things slightly easier and wouldn't create any problems here

          2) I'm guessing this is an actual FCSA umbrella - as some need to steal holiday pay to cover the costs they pay to agencies to be on the agency's preferred supplier lists (PSL).

          edit to add Professional passport does have rules over the payment process of holiday pay, FCSA don't for reasons that should be obvious from the statement above.

          3) Did you start this case while working with the umbrella or after you left - as different rules apply.

          4) You have started this within the appropriate time frames (i.e. within 3 months of taking an unpaid holiday or 3 months of leaving).

          5) Check that the Holiday pay payment process was not documented in their handbook - I doubt it will matter if it is or isn't but be prepared for questions about it.

          6) Have you had a lawyer or someone check what you put in the ET1 claim and any witness statements that the umbrella may be planning to use?

          It's worth saying that there should be a whole heap of these cases coming forward but it's actually hard to claim the full amount as you can only go back 2 years max and then only if you can show no long (3 month) period without any holiday being taken as any claim would stop at that point (example below)

          Suppose you were claiming today and your took "unpaid" holiday pay in June, April and January 2021, December and August 2020

          then the claim will only go back to December 2020 as the August holday is more than 3 months previously (yep again unfair but that's the law)


          Oh and finally - Good luck, if you need any advice PM me and I will try to point you in an appropriate direction - but you may wish to speak to

          Temple Crawford - Professional Passport
          Julie Kermode - iwork

          James Poyser - offpayroll

          as all of them would be as interested as we are in getting an appropriate result that could be used going forward.
          Last edited by eek; 29 August 2021, 08:35.
          merely at clientco for the entertainment

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post

            I don't really understand that explaination of the situation but is this a case of agency workers being pushed in to unscupulous umbrellas that Cojak (I think) has posted about or is this a situation of a highly paid skilled contractor having to use an approved umbrella from FCSA?

            There are times when you really don't add value when try to post on every thread in the professional forums - this is definitely one of those times.
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by eek View Post

              There are times when you really don't add value when try to post on every thread in the professional forums - this is definitely one of those times.
              You win some, you lose some. It's a discussion forum, not a 100% get it right everytime forum. I learn as I post and think it's a fair question as I don't know if there is a difference. I learn from the answers so if you'd like to provide me with one I can learn a bit more and not do it again.
              'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by eek View Post

                There are times when you really don't add value when try to post on every thread in the professional forums - this is definitely one of those times.
                I felt that others had the right advice to give. I was more reassuring the OP that it wasn’t silliness that got them in this position (which I felt was equally important). ?
                "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
                - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by cojak View Post

                  I felt that others had the right advice to give. I was more reassuring the OP that it wasn’t silliness that got them in this position (which I felt was equally important). ?
                  My comment wasn't aimed at you, Cojak. It just seemed silly to say look at these threads Given that the OP is well beyond the state where everyone else got to and then gave up.

                  The issue here is that because this is (from a quick Google) the first case of this sort we really need a well prepared clear cut case that creates case law (Yes I know it's only an employment tribunal but decisions there impact future decisions) and I would prefer that we had clueful people ensuring the case was as clear cut as possible.
                  Last edited by eek; 29 August 2021, 13:30.
                  merely at clientco for the entertainment

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Thank you for all your thoughts on this subject. It is sad that this does not seem to be an isolated case, and that other Umbrellas seem to be treating their employees in this way.

                    My Umbrella is RGF STAFFING UK LTD formerly known as ADVANTAGE RESOURCING UK LTD. I can't find them on FCSA (an organisation that is new to me). I was working at MOD and the Umbrella are on the Defence Business Services framework and so I was put with them. I think Public Sector Resourcing are in there somewhere too. MOD/DBS have said that this claim (for Unlawful Deduction from Wages) is nothing to do with them and that I need to take it up with the Umbrella.

                    I worked for three and a bit years and it was only during the third year that I discovered I had to be filling in their form to get paid every time I took a day holiday. As a result during the third year I did fill in the form and get paid holiday pay.

                    My claim is for the first two years where I was unaware of the need for the form (as I had not been told about it) and I assumed that (like normal employment) holiday pay is wrapped into regular pay amounts and regular pay process. I took the holiday and recorded that using the Fieldglass timesheet system, so the Umbrella were aware I was taking holiday and not paying me.

                    I have an Employment Tribunal date of 16th September and RGF/Advantage have employed Gowlings Solicitors to represent them at the Tribunal. I am representing myself on the Tribunal.

                    My claim is that RGF/Advantage were aware I was taking holiday, I took all actions I could practically do and that they should have been paying me - I made the claim as soon as I was aware (that I was not being paid), and I consider that their non-payment amounts to "Unlawful Deduction from Wages" in Law.

                    Gowlings are (I think) arguing that RGF/Advantage had no obligation to pay as I did not notify them using the correct form (ie the form that they had not told me about).

                    Gowlings are also (I think) arguing that the claim is "out of time" even if it was Unlawful Deduction from Wages. I think that this is inequitable (simply unfair) as I made the claim as soon as I was aware of the issue. I consider that it was not "reasonably practicable" for me to bring my claim within the three months usually required, meaning that my claim can still be heard despite it being outside the three-month period.

                    Any further thoughts or guidance appreciated on the lines of argument, or any precedent / comparable cases....?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X