Originally posted by TalkingCheese
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Dear Mr Taxpayer
HMRC strongly refutes the suggestion that your original letter was changed in any way.
The copy we sent you merely clarified it with retrospective effect.
Yours sincerely
HMRCLast edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 10 April 2015, 13:02.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by screwthis View PostWhat legal difference if any does that extra line make?
HMRC Tax Return Enquiries | Section 9A Taxes ManagementComment
-
Originally posted by screwthis View PostWhat legal difference if any does that extra line make?Comment
-
HMRC Fraudulent copies
I hope that the names of the HMRC officials who signed or re-sent these doctored letters are being recorded and forwarded to NTRT so that these relevant individuals can be taken to court to appear along with Mr B and the other lying bar stewards when our Civil action proceeds.Comment
-
Originally posted by screwthis View PostWhat legal difference if any does that extra line make?Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostBy adding the heading "Section 9a TMA 1970 Notice" it turns the letter from just a general letter to a formal notice of enquiry.Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!Comment
-
Originally posted by portseven View PostCall me cynical but you think they are going to zero out the charge on the basis of that?
I'd like to see HMRC trying explaining it to a Judge.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostI don't know but it would be worth taking it to a tribunal.
I'd like to see HMRC trying explaining it to a Judge.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment