Originally posted by Munchers
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
IR35 - Guilty as charged! - Updated May 2016 - NOT GUILTY!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Oh dear oh dear. If there are basic mistakes being made on fundamental issues how many others are going to come out of the woodwork I wonder. Are these two contracts with the same client and have you only ever had one client?
You are aware of the 24 month rule? 😜'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
.
Originally posted by GazCol View PostJust to make sure I understand this right - you were/are being paid directly into your personal bank account? There's no other entity between you and the end client?
That is not quite the same as 'Me'
But for the avoidance of doubt OP, was it you???Comment
-
Originally posted by GazCol View PostJust to make sure I understand this right - you were/are being paid directly into your personal bank account? There's no other entity between you and the end client?Comment
-
Originally posted by Munchers View PostNo, another contractor was which HM caught and are fining the business- I suspect they weren't declaring this.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by Munchers View PostTo clarify, investigation only started about 6 weeks where they asked for info evidence to as to why I was outside IR35. They're looking at one year only but I was trying to establish my risk ie how many years.
Originally posted by Munchers View PostI have had two contracts over the last 6 years. The last contract was rolled on every 6 months as I was asked to do more work. I realise now and accept this is a basic mistake, I should have got a new contract signed each time.
Okay, you may have to forget about Mutuality of Obligation - you may have torpedoed that one. Focus on the other two - Right of Substitution and Discretion & Control.Comment
-
...
Originally posted by centurian View PostYes, they are only allowed to initially look back at the past year. However, if they find anything in that return (they have), they are allowed to look back over the past 6 years (sometimes longer, but I doubt that would apply).
Ouch, that's not good
Okay, you may have to forget about Mutuality of Obligation - you may have torpedoed that one. Focus on the other two - Right of Substitution and Discretion & Control.
MOO may not be a lost cause if there were any periods during that time where work was not offered or was not accepted. Depends on how the OP handled leave and sickness and WFH in practice.Comment
-
Discretion and Control
Few posting here seem to have much control.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
So on a 'rolling' contract, don't you have to still sign a new contract? Or was it just like a 'statement of works' that you signed every 6 months?
Some good advice on CUK a while back led to me changing the contract terms and objectives every on renewal. I also do my best to ensure that the underlying day-to-day tasks change, as much as is realistic anyway.
As for MOO, for those contractors that take holidays mid-contract: when planning a holiday, rather than informing the client that you will be taking 2 weeks off in August etc, wouldn't it be a good idea to get the client to write an email to you advising that they have no work for you during August and won't need your services for those 2 weeks?
Edit: on the MOO question, this is like all the banks forcing contractors to have 10 consecutive days out of the office and off the network. I had to do this at the bank I was contracted at.Last edited by ChimpMaster; 8 July 2014, 10:36.Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI hope to god you don't have to submit any written evidence for your case.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment