Originally posted by youngguy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Public sector IR35 consultation launched
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Totally agree. The point I am also trying to make is that being on DoS (if you managed to ) does not make you safe just because you are not on CL one, which I think is what Bob eluded toOriginally posted by northernladuk View PostYeah but they've taken steps to close that down and put all contingent resourcing through other channels. People shouldn't be using GCloud for this type of resourcing anymore. I am sure it's not watertight but you might as well discount it for now. Unless you mean PSC via a consultancy offering GCloud services which is what we've been discussing recently.Comment
-
Thanks , what bit am I looking at? (Not being sarcastic!)Originally posted by bobspud View PostTake a look at the last link in the post above yours...Comment
-
The first few pages discuss non-outcome and outcome based work.Originally posted by youngguy View PostThanks , what bit am I looking at? (Not being sarcastic!)
with the kicker at the bottom
"If the department hirer is responsible for the work done, then the role is classified as Contingent Labour."Comment
-
I ended up being called twice on two consecutive days AFTER i left my DWP gig by some internal DWP department to quiz me about the nature of my engagement, time sheeting and sign off etc etc. The first time I got rather concerned as I thought it was compliance related.
The second day they called, I pushed a little harder and was happy with what they were saying, which is it seems they don't have the foggiest what is going on, and they are trying to reign things in quickly.
In any case, I've not got three prospective jobs I'm being put forward for for the Home Office, HMRC (lol) and now the ONS in Cardiff for which each agent after being quizzed by me specifically about the framework this is being recruited under, has in 2/3 cases confirmed that this is now a specific work package under a none CL1 framework. They seem to know what is up at the moment. The ONS one they are offering to PAY for me to come and do a technical test. Crazy times.
I can't believe I'm actually entertaining these calls, but the rates are so stupidly high at the moment that the IR35 caught rate is higher than what I was on before after a standard Ltd company takehome rate. Then again that WAS on CL1 so I did the right thing walking away from that imho.Comment
-
Thanks. I thought (perhaps incorrectly) you were saying the other frameworks were therefore "safe" ? I still think the PSC decision tree would apply would it not?Originally posted by bobspud View PostThe first few pages discuss non-outcome and outcome based work.
with the kicker at the bottom
"If the department hirer is responsible for the work done, then the role is classified as Contingent Labour."Comment
-
Yes the other frameworks are safe but not because the government won't look at the IR35 issue. Rather because you are likely to own the outcome and be solely responsible for its delivery.Originally posted by youngguy View PostThanks. I thought (perhaps incorrectly) you were saying the other frameworks were therefore "safe" ? I still think the PSC decision tree would apply would it not?Comment
-
But as Greenfields said, that won't make you exempt from the digital tool, so we can't say for sure any frameworks are safeOriginally posted by bobspud View PostYes the other frameworks are safe but not because the government won't look at the IR35 issue. Rather because you are likely to own the outcome and be solely responsible for its delivery.Comment
-
I'd say two things thoughOriginally posted by nucastle View PostI ended up being called twice on two consecutive days AFTER i left my DWP gig by some internal DWP department to quiz me about the nature of my engagement, time sheeting and sign off etc etc. The first time I got rather concerned as I thought it was compliance related.
The second day they called, I pushed a little harder and was happy with what they were saying, which is it seems they don't have the foggiest what is going on, and they are trying to reign things in quickly.
In any case, I've not got three prospective jobs I'm being put forward for for the Home Office, HMRC (lol) and now the ONS in Cardiff for which each agent after being quizzed by me specifically about the framework this is being recruited under, has in 2/3 cases confirmed that this is now a specific work package under a none CL1 framework. They seem to know what is up at the moment. The ONS one they are offering to PAY for me to come and do a technical test. Crazy times.
I can't believe I'm actually entertaining these calls, but the rates are so stupidly high at the moment that the IR35 caught rate is higher than what I was on before after a standard Ltd company takehome rate. Then again that WAS on CL1 so I did the right thing walking away from that imho.
1) agents will say anything to get you to sign. I've heard all sorts but no one knows until at least Nov 23.
2) don't forget the paye bit.Comment
-
ONS don't recruit through Capita anyway and they don't use the CLone framework, or they didn't when I was there a little while back.Originally posted by nucastle View PostI ended up being called twice on two consecutive days AFTER i left my DWP gig by some internal DWP department to quiz me about the nature of my engagement, time sheeting and sign off etc etc. The first time I got rather concerned as I thought it was compliance related.
The second day they called, I pushed a little harder and was happy with what they were saying, which is it seems they don't have the foggiest what is going on, and they are trying to reign things in quickly.
In any case, I've not got three prospective jobs I'm being put forward for for the Home Office, HMRC (lol) and now the ONS in Cardiff for which each agent after being quizzed by me specifically about the framework this is being recruited under, has in 2/3 cases confirmed that this is now a specific work package under a none CL1 framework. They seem to know what is up at the moment. The ONS one they are offering to PAY for me to come and do a technical test. Crazy times.
I can't believe I'm actually entertaining these calls, but the rates are so stupidly high at the moment that the IR35 caught rate is higher than what I was on before after a standard Ltd company takehome rate. Then again that WAS on CL1 so I did the right thing walking away from that imho."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment