• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Public sector IR35 consultation launched

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Think I have found an interesting chink in the armour of this mess...

    I was doing some work yesterday and one of the documents that fell out of it was this one:

    http://ccs-agreements.cabinetoffice....WR%20Guide.pdf

    This document covers the agency worker regulations the interesting part is the section Who does not fall within the scope of the regulations?

    Basically it states that the if the hiring manager rather than the managed service provider directs staff it will bring those acting "as a business on their own account" into scope. So by my reckoning if any department is foolish enough to make the blanket statement I control and supervise all my contractors on site then every one that has worked there since the start of the Agency Workers Regulations were introduced will have the right to go and ask for their holiday back pay and money to cover any other benefit that was available to permanent staff...

    As usual I don't think that UKHO have thought this through...

    Comment


      Originally posted by bobspud View Post
      I was doing some work yesterday and one of the documents that fell out of it was this one:

      http://ccs-agreements.cabinetoffice....WR%20Guide.pdf

      This document covers the agency worker regulations the interesting part is the section Who does not fall within the scope of the regulations?

      Basically it states that the if the hiring manager rather than the managed service provider directs staff it will bring those acting "as a business on their own account" into scope. So by my reckoning if any department is foolish enough to make the blanket statement I control and supervise all my contractors on site then every one that has worked there since the start of the Agency Workers Regulations were introduced will have the right to go and ask for their holiday back pay and money to cover any other benefit that was available to permanent staff...

      As usual I don't think that UKHO have thought this through...
      Very good find... After 12 week (probationary) you are entitled to 28 days annual leave, paternity/maternity leave and potentially sick pay too!!

      Comment


        Originally posted by nobody123 View Post
        Very good find... After 12 week (probationary) you are entitled to 28 days annual leave, paternity/maternity leave and potentially sick pay too!!
        But only if the department gets unreasonable and tells you that they are in charge and you are a direct report...

        Comment


          On the plus side, public sector IR35 rules + fall in GBP is shaping up nicely for my plans to import UK contractors into Ireland.

          Comment


            IPSE webinar on the proposed reforms at lunchtime today

            https://www.ipse.co.uk/events/tue-11...sector-webinar

            I believe it's open to non-members too.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              On the plus side, public sector IR35 rules + fall in GBP is shaping up nicely for my plans to import UK contractors into Ireland.
              The fall in the pound made pricing the products I'm planning to sell very easy. £=$=euro
              Last edited by eek; 1 November 2016, 08:12.
              merely at clientco for the entertainment

              Comment


                Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
                IPSE webinar on the proposed reforms at lunchtime today
                Fantastic waste of time. If there's one thing IPSE doesn't ever disappoint with, it's their consistency in being useless.
                Help preserve the right to be a contractor in the UK

                Comment


                  Originally posted by DotasScandal View Post
                  Fantastic waste of time. If there's one thing IPSE doesn't ever disappoint with, it's their consistency in being useless.
                  I didn't waste my time. How bad was it and what facts that we understand have they still not grasped.
                  merely at clientco for the entertainment

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by DotasScandal View Post
                    Fantastic waste of time. If there's one thing IPSE doesn't ever disappoint with, it's their consistency in being useless.
                    I found it informative and helpful. Each to their own. It was not aimed at people who have already studied the document in detail, it was to inform those who haven't. As such, I think it served a useful purpose.
                    Last edited by mudskipper; 1 November 2016, 16:16.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
                      I found it informative and helpful. Each to their own. It was not aimed at people who have already studied the document in detail, it was to inform those who haven't. As such, I think it served a useful purpose.
                      Indeed. Haters gonna hate.
                      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X