• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

So what do our resident web heads think of this?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by DaveB View Post
    But not that much time....
    That's more time than I got before sending off VAT return for last quarter...

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
      As I said, it has been available for a while.
      It was only available if you had additional DNS software on client side, it would not work from other places - new approach would solve it completely.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        It was only available if you had additional DNS software on client side, it would not work from other places - new approach would solve it completely.
        Works fine apparently, just need to use their DNS.

        PZZ

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
          Works fine apparently, just need to use their DNS.

          PZZ


          So it would not work with people from other countries that don't use "their DNS"?

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by AtW View Post


            So it would not work with people from other countries that don't use "their DNS"?
            I thought the whole idea of Unicode was that you can use any character of any language you like, and whatever character you typed would generate the binary equivalent, thus what you type or see in your browser address line does not have to be in any particular language. From what I can see this seems to be true. I certainly remember seeing Japanese being typed as URL's last time I wast there.

            PZZ

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
              I thought the whole idea of Unicode was that you can use any character of any language you like, and whatever character you typed would generate the binary equivalent, thus what you type or see in your browser address line does not have to be in any particular language. From what I can see this seems to be true. I certainly remember seeing Japanese being typed as URL's last time I wast there.
              Unicode is unicode, DNS system is DNS system - it did not support universally Unicode (until now it seems). This means people could hack their own systems, but they won't work everywhere like proper DNS should.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
                I thought the whole idea of Unicode was that you can use any character of any language you like, and whatever character you typed would generate the binary equivalent, thus what you type or see in your browser address line does not have to be in any particular language. From what I can see this seems to be true. I certainly remember seeing Japanese being typed as URL's last time I wast there.

                PZZ
                That is exactly the idea of unicode, but most DNS implementations ( Bind, MS DNS Server etc ) do not support unicode as standard.

                There are a number of local hacks available that will work for individual DNS servers but they are not consitent, and they only work for those users who's DNS is configured to use them. The vast majority of DNS services provided by ISP's, Tier 1,2 and 3 providers and individual organizations *do not* support unicode.

                The proposal for IDN ( International Domain Names ) now passed and about to be implemented will effectively mean that every DNS server in the world will need to provide partial unicode support as standard with no further action required by the client.

                I say partial because it only applies to the unicode equivalent of the latin alphanumerics, it will not include unicode equivalents of non alphanumeric characters not currently permitted in domain names.
                "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                Comment


                  #18
                  The spec for Internationalised Domain Names (IDNs) has been stable for ages now, IIRC. What ICANN announced was a fast track process to get a limited number of new ccTLDs in action, so that we can actually get it working in TRW:
                  With the approval of the IDNC Final Report by the ICANN Board of Directors, ICANN is now at a transition point, focusing on developing implementable solutions to the IDNC recommendations.

                  - http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/

                  Comment


                    #19
                    I can't see it working reliably anytime soon - they are insane to have agreed this to happen in the first place. SKA will have to support them though

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      I can't see it working reliably anytime soon - they are insane to have agreed this to happen in the first place. SKA will have to support them though
                      I'm sure you and scurine army can knock up a solution over a cup of tea and a few acorns
                      "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X