Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Multiple desktops is probably quite good (I remember seeing the same thing on a UNIX Workstation 20 years ago), and DirectX 12 will be worth it for gamers (there was some big technical advance to do with multiple cores that I can't remember). Mostly just GUI fluff though.
Never had a real issue with win 8.1, though the upgrade on my Lenovo Helix was painful. I don't consider it to be a pig either.
I'm looking forward to using the multiple desktops, but I really haven't used it long enough to say if the Edge browsers or any of the other changes are massive improvements.
And better multi core performance allegedly, but I thought with 8 games used cores efficiently so ????
Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.
Multiple desktops is probably quite good (I remember seeing the same thing on a UNIX Workstation 20 years ago)
Multiple desktops is probably the same crock of tulipe it is on OSX, Linux or p.o.s.OS generally : program windows will always appear/be visible in the wrong desktop and you will not be able to find whatever you are looking for whereever you are looking for it...
Gave up on multiple desktops the same 20 years ago you first saw them...
Of course MS do have a deserved rep for getting things to work well that the authors of p.o.s.OS fail to do, so I may be pleasantly surprised...
Comment