The negative net worth isnt necessarily a problem. It doesn't indicate it is operating at a loss. All it indicates is that historical cap ex has exceeded historical retained profits.
E.g. spend 50k on infrastructure early on.
Of course it can be indicative of issues but the headline figure is no more than a warning.
It may be worth heeding though in the absence of full accounts to ascertain why.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Umbrella confusion!!!!!!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Umbrella confusion!!!!!!!"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostWell I'd be careful if I were you - that company only has £100 to its name according to Companies House. Where's the rest of the money gone?- 2015 accounts shows a net worth of -£10281 (total assets £49355, total liabilities £59636)
- No VAT number on the website but they are VAT registered though (GB174021733) so they don't seem to understand the law about things like that
- I'd be wary of using someone who doesn't seem to be an accountant (or at least doesn't mention anything about being certified or anything like that) in the preparation of my accounts.
Each to their own and I hope that they don't disappear with the money - but I'd be running away from an umbrella company that is making that much of a loss, to be honest.
(Interesting fact - one of their directors is a director of the British Olympic Association with Seb Coe et al)Last edited by missinggreenfields; 22 September 2016, 14:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheITguy View PostHi,
I also found it confusing when I started out and found that when I contracted through different agencies they would tell me I could only use certain Umbrella Companies and usually they were expensive!
Eventually I settled with Umbrella Fella and they've been great so far, I originally used the PAYE option but they've recently set me up with my own limited company which means they still take care of all my payroll, I no longer have agencies telling me who to use and my take home is better!
It's still a mine field out there though so good luck, this is just my experience and it's up to you who you use but I got fed up with being told who to use by the aqencies and constantly having to swap payroll companies when I changed assignments.
Leave a comment:
-
Umbrella Company
Hi,
I also found it confusing when I started out and found that when I contracted through different agencies they would tell me I could only use certain Umbrella Companies and usually they were expensive!
Eventually I settled with Umbrella Fella and they've been great so far, I originally used the PAYE option but they've recently set me up with my own limited company which means they still take care of all my payroll, I no longer have agencies telling me who to use and my take home is better!
It's still a mine field out there though so good luck, this is just my experience and it's up to you who you use but I got fed up with being told who to use by the aqencies and constantly having to swap payroll companies when I changed assignments.
Originally posted by Gandy View PostHello all,
Very new to this and the contractor environment, I work freelance via an agency was approached by a few umbrella companies, one being Extra, and what appears to be a subsidiary, Winchester (?). After researching, and using this forum as a really useful source of info, I understand they base there payment structure around loans in order to avoid paying 100% tax or at least less, which sounds more than a bit dodge. So I sacked that idea and went looking around including the AUCAE consortium.
I looked at their advice and I made a decision to go with a company who are able to offer more money, as they operate in a slightly different way to others umbrella companies as well as providing accounting for limited companies etc. The micro ltd option resolves any issues with working in the public sector, as i dip ion and out of that carrying out IT work, but it doesn't come into effect until April anyway but it's better to get ahead of the game. Ultimately HMRC and never going to rest until we're all forced out of contracts and subjected to the same deductions as everyone else which is unfair and going
I was advised at the time of joining that the AUCAE is a monopoly of umbrella companies that are pretty fixed and rigid in terms of the way they represent their contractors.
Would anyone have any advice? As to be fair, I cant be bothered with the uncertainty and worry that I may be liable for doing something wrong, after what i consider to be a fair amount of due diligence researching etc, and may end up just setting up my own ltd company with an accountant to avoid the nonsense etc.
Also is there ANY objective sites, forums etc that offer impartial reviews of umbrella companies? As each area I've researched is either clearly set up for a group of companies’ advertisement purposes or a collective group of companies with a different set of agendas.
Many thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
We will be at the IR35 Public Sector Round Table on 6th September, so will feedback any info we get, but as you all say it appears to be pretty much a done deal, as with the T&S changes. We attended those too and it remained exactly as expected they had already concluded that around 80% of contractors would be caught!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Milkyway View Post
Scary days indeed for contracting.
I wonder what QDOS et al. will do then. Probably that explains why they are moving into accounting, etc. business model? (so they can slowly phase out the IR35 related business from their portfolio).Last edited by northernladuk; 1 August 2016, 09:04.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostLet's hope so.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View Post...and how long before you think it's going to apply to the private sector as well?
Either that or it will all be undone within six months.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View Post...and how long before you think it's going to apply to the private sector as well?
That said, as you say, if this will also soon apply to private sector, that is a worry then!
I will certainly have to think about slowly stopping my consulting/contracting work ,and increase my dependency on my software product development / sales business as my mainstream income flow (from current 65/35 => to almost 100% from product development and 0 from consultancy/contracting).
Scary days indeed for contracting.
I wonder what QDOS et al. will do then. Probably that explains why they are moving into accounting, etc. business model? (so they can slowly phase out the IR35 related business from their portfolio).
Leave a comment:
-
...and how long before you think it's going to apply to the private sector as well?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Milkyway View PostWhat is that all about?? HAVE to be?? Seriously??
Govt. linky please!
For consultation read done deal with the slight possibility of very minor changes.
It will impact all work in the public sector. Example 3 shows how it would impact consultancies - which some hoped would provide a get out clause
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Milkyway View PostWhat is that all about?? HAVE to be?? Seriously??
Govt. linky please!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gandy View Post251 for a day's work. 65 pound paid by the umbrella, whistles off to the accountant....
Is the industry regulated? Apart from other members of the industry.
This really isn't rocket science. It's incredibly simple. If you're working through a legitimate umbrella company, it's PAYE or nothing. That means full employer's and employee's National Insurance contributions too. You should expect to retain something like ~55-65% of your income, depending on your earnings.
If you can't understand this (quickly), you're probably not a legitimate poster.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: