• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Apple watch decent for health features?"

Collapse

  • Chris Bryce
    replied
    Originally posted by courtg9000 View Post
    One thing with the advanced health features ecg, heart rate etc is that the medical profession do not like smart watches doing this and will say that the watch is actually inaccurate, so having an argument with a doctor about your heart rate based on your watch results will get short shrift in general. With me they have to do things differently and just do all the tests anyway but I know of people who don't have my health history being fobbed off by the medics because of smart watch results.
    I've heard the opposite. I guess there'll be those that do and those that don't.

    I certainly know a few doctors who hate Dr Google (mostly because used well, Dr Google is better than the average 75 second Zoom call with a GP). I know in the States some medical practices ask their patients to connect Apple Health up to their in-house systems and a few big data projects have also used anonymised Health data.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Bryce
    replied
    I have one, as does SWMBO. I;m actually on my second.

    If you're in the Apple walled garden it's pretty damned good.

    Obviously it connects to iPhone and the Health app, good-ish at O2 level, heart rate, ECG, step counter, exercise monitor (calories, distance, speed) &etc. It also has very cool emergency features such as fall and crash detection (auto dials 999 and designated contacts in an emergency if you can't/don't intervene to stop it).

    As you'd expect it has fairly deep integration into the walled garden: unlocks your Mac if you're very near it, haptic nudges on your wrist when using Apple Maps directions, quick replies to messages, Dick Tracy type calls (if you absolutely must) all that sort of jazz. It can also store downloaded music, podcasts (and audiobooks I think) so you can gym/jog/walk/meander around aimlessly listening to those via BT headphones without having to carry your phone. I also find it useful for Siri voice commands for Home automations and shortcuts.

    If you're not hooked into the walled garden, then these things will be of very varying appeal.

    Oh, and it also tells the time.

    Battery life isn't great, and if you wanted to sleep monitor, then remembering to charge it for a while before bedtime or before you need it of a morning would be a necessary PITA, but it does charge quite quickly.

    Leave a comment:


  • courtg9000
    replied
    One thing with the advanced health features ecg, heart rate etc is that the medical profession do not like smart watches doing this and will say that the watch is actually inaccurate, so having an argument with a doctor about your heart rate based on your watch results will get short shrift in general. With me they have to do things differently and just do all the tests anyway but I know of people who don't have my health history being fobbed off by the medics because of smart watch results.

    Leave a comment:


  • fatJock
    replied
    I had one for a while and the worst thing about it hands down was the battery life - especially if you want to use it for consistency / tracking etc. Can't track your sleep when it's on the charger etc etc and you'll be charging it every 1-2 days.

    On recommendation I shifted to Garmin (I have a Fenix 7 Solar) and it's head and shoulders above provided you don't need the apple integration. It has a decent app, hooks in with Apple health too (though I don't use it) and other bits like MyFitnessPal and Strava (which I do use). It has maps too so I use it for hiking, has Spotify integration if the gym is your thing too (you don't need your phone to play - you just download the playlists to your watch).

    Battery life is about 7-10 days then a charge for a couple of hours or so - I have the option with solar too which extends it a little but more of a gimmick. All the usual sensors on it that you're talking about. Absolutely love it - head and shoulders above Apple watch.

    Garmin fēnix® 7 – Solar Edition | Multisport GPS Smartwatch
    Last edited by fatJock; 19 November 2024, 13:23.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    started a topic Apple watch decent for health features?

    Apple watch decent for health features?

    I stopped wearing watches years ago but am having some health concerns and for my own peace of mind I'd like to keep a track of things like my heart so that if I go to the doctor I can say "look, data" - and to be totally honest I see a twinge of hypochondria as I get into my 40s and think this would help rather than lead to obsession

    Anyway, I use iPhone and am wondering if a Apple Watch is the obvious route to go down here. A bit pricey and I swore I'd never have one as justa gadget but if the various health things (heart, 'ecg', O2, sleep) are legitimate rather than silly gimmicks then I presume it will give less headaches than a different manufacturer?
    I gym and stuff so I suppose it's useful for that too though I'm not 100% sure how! Is it a reliable heart-rate monitor to track heart rate recovery and stuff?

    The modern watches with this ECG and arrhythmia and so on sound like either a significant step forward in practical personal health or just Apple guff and I really can't tell which. So I'd love to hear any first hand experience of people who either use them or have done more research?

Working...
X