
I got the impression that they thought “Let’s just devise a setting in which to repeat some of the scenes people liked in the first one, though not the best one because that would be hard to repeat, and then cobble together a vague story to fit around all that.” And though this approach seems to have worked for the Mission: Impossible films, they didn’t manage to pull it off for this one. So it’s very much a curate’s egg: parts of it are excellent, but overall, it stinks

It’s a shame, really. The first one didn’t need a sequel but once they decided to make one, they had such a good springboard to launch from. And they couldn’t be bothered and made this instead

Anyway, I then rewatched Ballerina (2025) which is derivative but manages to be a good film in its own right

Goodnight all







.
.
Leave a comment: