Originally posted by northernladyuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Blanket decisions of inside IR35
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Blanket decisions of inside IR35"
Collapse
-
Just talking to a former contractor colleague at an NHS Trust.
He pointed out that the legislation has a due care clause which doesn't allow them to blanket review the roles, which is what they previously did (i.e. all inside IR35). He is outside IR35 now.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LoughriggFell View PostI guess you don't need to take "reasonable care" if you just ban PSC's.
Leave a comment:
-
Are we seeing a similar situation to that in the 70s where a rule\legislation (I'm unclear on the details) was introduced which effectively meant trading as a sole trader via an agent became impossible as they insisted on Ltd?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andy Hallett View PostWe've just had a trust refuse to deal with PSC's to be fair the first we had.
They do realise it will be cheaper for them to take outside IR35 PSCs on, don't they?
Leave a comment:
-
Similar situation, one agency terminated all contracts on the 19th and restarted as an umbrella on 20th stating
'In some cases PSC’s, whether paid gross or net will not be allowed in the supply chain'
I guess you don't need to take "reasonable care" if you just ban PSC's.
Leave a comment:
-
Capita
All contracts ended by capita then any renewal by umbrella only - sort of blanket decision, but not.?...
Leave a comment:
-
A little panic in this last week is what we are seeing at this moment in time
Leave a comment:
-
We've just had a trust refuse to deal with PSC's to be fair the first we had.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by marius123 View PostYep. HMRC's digital transformation guys declared all contractors inside last Monday. They're losing a lot of talented quislings.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lucycontractorumbrella View PostThe irony - today I got a call from a contractor within HMRC saying they had made the blanket decision for inside too
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bluenose View Post“Put simply, this [new reasonable care clause at 61T6c)] means that public sector clients must not make general, blanket determinations” of contractors’ IR35 status, says Qdos Contractor.
harumph !
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by teapot418 View PostNo real clarity about what the individual can do if the client has made a blanket (inside) determination though.
And that was why come October everyone around here was saying that the only appropriate attack is probably to seek employment rights...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hollyblue View PostPutting that aside, given that this is only my 2nd week in this role and I have changed PSB and Agency are my chances of retrograb reduced do we think?
But I would definitely declare the first few weeks of this contract as inside, if you stay. That way, if ever investigated, you can claim to be responsible about IR35, otherwise you look like a tax dodger for a few weeks worth of tax savings. Don't do that.
I'd also be telling them if they are going to put their hands in your pocket and rip you off just so they can avoid conflict among other contractors that they should at least uplift your rate by 15% to cover the employers NI.
Leave a comment:
-
Client cannot be swayed and have determined me inside, even though my T&C are completely different to the other 'contractors' in the team and they have stated that they are treating us all the same. They are clearly concerned that if the others find out they'll all want to re-negotiate same as me.
I'm resigned that to remain in this contact I'm going to have to be inside. It's a very local role to home and the T&C I've agreed with them are quite favourable. Putting that aside, given that this is only my 2nd week in this role and I have changed PSB and Agency are my chances of retrograb reduced do we think?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Yesterday 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: