- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "10% taken off loans and salary as an expense when settling"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by cwah View PostI settled with HMRC without the 10% claimed of the loan and already paid 1/3rd of the settlement....
Any chance I can get the 10% off? Could I write them a letter telling they stipulated they should treat everyone fairly, equally and the same? Maybe they'd give me a 10% reduction?
Thank you
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by nickyboyc View PostHMRC don't give a f88k about treating people equally and fairly. It's just about getting the most out of each tax payer they can. It's why they don't tell you or even ask you if you may have incurred any expenses when calculating your settlement figures. For the years I've settled they never looked at or referred to my tax returns in any case.
Leave a comment:
-
By all means write to them. I suspect they will reply with either or all of.... "you should have asked", "you should have known to ask".
The expenses allowance HMRC have seemingly allowed in a number of case is not published in their settlement terms anywhere.
I am going to do a Freedom of Information request asking HMRC how many tax payers settling disguised remuneration schemes were allowed the 10% expenses allowance for all years they were settling when a) these expenses were not on their original tax return and b) no evidence provided of the expenses i.e a blanket 10% expenses allowance was applied.
Once I have the response I will decide where to go next. I am hoping my MP will get involved. For the years I've settled it would have reduced my bill by more than £10k. HMRC don't give a f88k about treating people equally and fairly. It's just about getting the most out of each tax payer they can. It's why they don't tell you or even ask you if you may have incurred any expenses when calculating your settlement figures. For the years I've settled they never looked at or referred to my tax returns in any case.
Leave a comment:
-
I settled with HMRC without the 10% claimed of the loan and already paid 1/3rd of the settlement....
Any chance I can get the 10% off? Could I write them a letter telling they stipulated they should treat everyone fairly, equally and the same? Maybe they'd give me a 10% reduction?
Thank you
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View Posthe was making money from helping people extract themselves from the consequences
Leave a comment:
-
Hi all,
Can I please ask those who claimed the expenses allowance if these expenses were detailed on your original tax returns?
Leave a comment:
-
I asked about claiming expenses against a settlement figure and was told to submit a claim. I was allowed 10% of the expenses claimed (without receipts) against the settlement. I was told this was the maximum permissible.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi All, I need help with settlement with HMRC. Did anyone have their expenses accepted by HMRC? If so, can you please PM me.
Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
I've asked HMRC about the 10% deduction of loan amounts and salary as an expense when settling and they replied saying that it's up to each individual tax payer to make an expenses claim when settling.
I am intrigued how any individual knew to do this, ask for this when settling. I don't believe it was published any where within settlement terms?
I'd really appreciate hearing how any one was aware of this.
The email I received from HMRC prior to this latest reply was them telling me how they have to treat every tax payer the same, fairly and equally. What a joke.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheDogsNads View PostWow! You and your chums drove someone off this forum who was freely giving pertinent advice and the best you can come up with is write to your MP?
Absolutely awesome!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheDogsNads View PostWow! You and your chums drove someone off this forum who was freely giving pertinent advice and the best you can come up with is write to your MP?
Absolutely awesome!
Webberg of course wasn't one of the in crowd who made money from selling the schemes, he was making money from helping people extract themselves from the consequences the in crowd had left those people in.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostI don't know if you'll get anywhere complaining to HMRC.
But a lot of people have found that getting their Member of Parliament to intervene often cuts through HMRC's intransigence. MPs routinely deal with HMRC on behalf of constituents.
Absolutely awesome!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by nickyboyc View Posthey,
Not sure what would be funny about anyone in this horrible situation not knowing about this 10% deduction from loans and salary whether it's too late or not.
My complaint would be that we should all be treated fairly and the same and see what can be done.
I still have my pre Dec 2010 loans to settle with them so finding out about this 10% deduction only recently will still have some value for me.
But a lot of people have found that getting their Member of Parliament to intervene often cuts through HMRC's intransigence. MPs routinely deal with HMRC on behalf of constituents.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: