As an addendum to this thread…
Mr Adrian Sacco has been banned from being a Director for 8 years
https://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov...umber=09473810
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IQ Consultants, Felicitas Solutions, ECS Trustees - loan repayment demands"
Collapse
-
And just to show that even Mods can get caught out, I'm adding this here...
Originally posted by cojak View PostHMRC and scammy, dodgy 'solutions' providers - that's who!
Sharks from both sides of the fence are circling people, sharks who are trying to find an 'in' to get past your defences and grab your money.
Take care who you accept PM's from - don't be too open exchanging information until you've checked them out and they've given you real life references.
A particular tactic is to pretend to be a fellow punter and ask you to email them outside CUK as they 'don't trust messages' - why do you think they say that?
(Oh, and don't fall for sob stories either. Tugging on heart strings is very easy for those who have no heart-strings of their own...)
This is the end of the public service announcement.
Leave a comment:
-
Let's not hide this thread away. let's highlight bullying and threats, shall we?
Posts modified in this thread to protect a poster.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Whowouldhavethought View PostI'll be honest with you, I didn't sleep last night. I feel sick to my stomach.
What I have done is reach out to a specialist legal firm this morning, and for that Eek, I thank you for bringing your findings to the table.
It has turned into a flame war, and I have my suspicions regarding who wants it to continue.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostI hope this thread isn't making anyone ill with worry. And I'm not being flippant here; I'm being serious.
I know only too well, from direct personal experience, where worrying can lead.
Sometimes folks speculate on things (Felicitas may be planning XYZ) without considering the impact this might have on people's state of mind.
What I have done is reach out to a specialist legal firm this morning, and for that Eek, I thank you for bringing your findings to the table.
Leave a comment:
-
I hope this thread isn't making anyone ill with worry. And I'm not being flippant here; I'm being serious.
I know only too well, from direct personal experience, where worrying can lead.
Sometimes folks speculate on things (Felicitas may be planning XYZ) without considering the impact this might have on people's state of mind.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostI think both posters who joined over the weekend are very dubious..
I have read EEKs posts and made a decision that is all.Last edited by GregRickshaw; 18 August 2020, 07:47.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GregRickshaw View Postand very true
Is this virtual Whack-a-mole?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Whowouldhavethought View PostThis is actually petrifying.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Emily1985 View PostI agree I’ve been a member since the weekend and the recent few weeks posts I have reviewed aren’t good reading on here to put it politely.
Trust in your legal opinions and not comments from posters. The Admin on the account did warn persons a few weeks ago . The app allows you to block ignore people as one poster mentions .
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostYes, people should speak to a professional, one that has the backing of a professional body.
I think that a Eek has been saying that. Don’t go by the recommendation of anonymous posters.
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Superfly View PostThe best thing people can do once they engage a professional adviser is to stay off this forum. If you must come on, then my advice is be passive and do not post anything.
Have some trust in your adviser, let them deal with it, that is what you are paying him/her for.
I think you will find that the forum will not add value once you have engaged a professional. I think it will be counter-intuitive to the benefit you should be experiencing when engaging an adviser. If you have any questions, direct them to your adviser. And don't advertise on here what your adviser tells you, do not share any emails or mailshots on here.
Remember you cannot trust everyone on here, you don't even know who we all are. And it doesn't really matter to you if the admin know who they are.
Trust in your legal opinions and not comments from posters. The Admin on the account did warn persons a few weeks ago . The app allows you to block ignore people as one poster mentions .
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Tezz View PostThe mods should be banning eek based on his recent Verbal diarrhoea scaremongering, it might be useful if he were a professional advisor, but he isn’t!
I’m in the same boat as you. Ignore him.
Much of the most sensible statements on here over the years have been from people giving advice seeking nothing in return. Iliketax is a good example.
It’s a tulipty situation but slamming people who have been posting on here for ten years isn’t the answer.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: