Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Calheta Consulting, 87% return, how exciting!"
Collapse
-
You can have the satisfaction of knowing that they'll come here eventually crying like little girls because the big, nasty HMRC wants to make them bankrupt and will someone please help them out of this hole (for free obv, because they're still thick and greedy, just potentially much, much poorer).
-
Originally posted by Zippy View PostI suspect you get entered in to a prize draw - the winners get shortlisted for investigation.

Leave a comment:
-
And they obviously come in packs - response received this morning in relation to tax payable: "I thought that a 10% maximum should be enough - I'll find another solution". Honestly, I wonder why I bother sometimes, I really doOriginally posted by cojak View PostWhich just goes to show that contractors can be both thick AND greedy!
Leave a comment:
-
Which just goes to show that contractors can be both thick AND greedy!Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostJust had a phone call from a newbie - obviously inside IR35 - wanting to know why he shouldn't join a scheme where he takes home 90%. Apparently 'rich people' and Google do it so why shouldn't he

Leave a comment:
-
Appears to be part of Onyx Management Ltd, who specialise in yacht management, aircraft management and payroll services. Which seems like a natural fit. The company operates out of the IoM. Their parent company appears to be Onyx Worldwide who are based in Switzerland.
Registered owner of the website is one Wilhelm Meir who also appears to be linked to Recruitment Solutions Ltd (rsl.org.im) and has had a few reviews in the press last year.
Recruitment Solutions gets tax break for bosses but not workers - Investigations
Not much to be found online about him in the usual places, but LinkedIn profiles exist for him under both UK and Portugal. Prior to 2009 he appears to have been a part qualified ACCA.
Leave a comment:
-
Do you get paid for shopping people to HMRC. If so let him and pass on the details in a months time.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostJust had a phone call from a newbie - obviously inside IR35 - wanting to know why he shouldn't join a scheme where he takes home 90%. Apparently 'rich people' and Google do it so why shouldn't he

Muppet.
Leave a comment:
-
Jesus!Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostJust had a phone call from a newbie - obviously inside IR35 - wanting to know why he shouldn't join a scheme where he takes home 90%. Apparently 'rich people' and Google do it so why shouldn't he

This is why we need to keep highlighting these schemes.
Leave a comment:
-
Just had a phone call from a newbie - obviously inside IR35 - wanting to know why he shouldn't join a scheme where he takes home 90%. Apparently 'rich people' and Google do it so why shouldn't he
Leave a comment:
-
1000% is equally possible, use the money to buy a balaclava and a shot gun, head into your local bank.......Originally posted by eek View Post163% is equally possible. Its an EBT which means that you don't need to pay out to the person what they pay in.
Simply by paying me using both the money I and others have paid in they can meet their promised figure while demonstrating
1)that the scheme was not risk free,
2)is a fully valid scheme where what is paid in doesn't correspond with the amount paid out
and that I have the cash available to cover the inevitable eventual rogering from HMRC.
Leave a comment:
-
163% is equally possible. Its an EBT which means that you don't need to pay out to the person what they pay in.Originally posted by Old Greg View Post120% is entirely achievable.
All income is converted into a Director's loan to an offshore account. You provide nil returns to the VAT man and keep your bags packed and your passport in your jacket pocket.
Simply by paying me using both the money I and others have paid in they can meet their promised figure while demonstrating
1)that the scheme was not risk free,
2)is a fully valid scheme where what is paid in doesn't correspond with the amount paid out
and that I have the cash available to cover the inevitable eventual rogering from HMRC.
Leave a comment:
-
120% is entirely achievable.Originally posted by AtW View PostIf it's less than 120%* then I am not interested.
* they pay me 20%
All income is converted into a Director's loan to an offshore account. You provide nil returns to the VAT man and keep your bags packed and your passport in your jacket pocket.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: