Calheta Consulting, 87% return, how exciting!

[eek]

I had someone call me a couple of months ago who was put out that I didn't sign up there and then for a 90% return. I can't remember who it was but wasn't especially polite to him.

Someone called me last month. when I explained the impact of BN66 on the people on that thread and the consequences of his work on the lives of others he really, really wasn't happy with me.

I did think mentioning the BN66 suicide would have been enough for him to stop trying to sell the scheme but he foolishly carried on.

[cojak]

On the other hand, if the noobs sign up, HMRC will spend all their resources chasing them, and leave us alone.

Low-hanging fruit and all that...

[LisaContractorUmbrella]

Low-hanging fruit and all that...

[Old Hack]

Someone offered me something called the Aikido defence or something not long ago. 100% - 8% to a fighting fund, so 92% in the mits. Seems to be something currently legal, but accountants wanted something back in case it went to court.

Did enough to scare me off.

[Old Greg]

If it's less than 120%* then I am not interested.

* they pay me 20%

120% is entirely achievable.

All income is converted into a Director's loan to an offshore account. You provide nil returns to the VAT man and keep your bags packed and your passport in your jacket pocket.

[eek]

120% is entirely achievable.

All income is converted into a Director's loan to an offshore account. You provide nil returns to the VAT man and keep your bags packed and your passport in your jacket pocket.

163% is equally possible. Its an EBT which means that you don't need to pay out to the person what they pay in.

Simply by paying me using both the money I and others have paid in they can meet their promised figure while demonstrating

1)that the scheme was not risk free,
2)is a fully valid scheme where what is paid in doesn't correspond with the amount paid out

and that I have the cash available to cover the inevitable eventual rogering from HMRC.

[proggy]

163% is equally possible. Its an EBT which means that you don't need to pay out to the person what they pay in.

Simply by paying me using both the money I and others have paid in they can meet their promised figure while demonstrating

1)that the scheme was not risk free,
2)is a fully valid scheme where what is paid in doesn't correspond with the amount paid out

and that I have the cash available to cover the inevitable eventual rogering from HMRC.

1000% is equally possible, use the money to buy a balaclava and a shot gun, head into your local bank.......

[LisaContractorUmbrella]

Just had a phone call from a newbie - obviously inside IR35 - wanting to know why he shouldn't join a scheme where he takes home 90%. Apparently 'rich people' and Google do it so why shouldn't he

[jmo21]

Just had a phone call from a newbie - obviously inside IR35 - wanting to know why he shouldn't join a scheme where he takes home 90%. Apparently 'rich people' and Google do it so why shouldn't he

Jesus!

This is why we need to keep highlighting these schemes.

[eek]

Just had a phone call from a newbie - obviously inside IR35 - wanting to know why he shouldn't join a scheme where he takes home 90%. Apparently 'rich people' and Google do it so why shouldn't he

Do you get paid for shopping people to HMRC. If so let him and pass on the details in a months time.

Muppet.