I think they should have arrested him and burned the tee shirt.
And as an extra concession they should have let him take it off first..
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Man get 4 months in prison for a wearing a t-shirt the state enforcers didnt like"
Collapse
-
The people wearing those probably won't have 77 prior convictions and still be on probation of some sort... and those shirts don't promote killing the current PM.
So there's a gap in the market.
Leave a comment:
-
I hope they're building some very big prisons for when Maggie dies.
Leave a comment:
-
Id consider him a ****, but I wouldnt consider it a criminal offence. I dont have a boss btw, as Im a contractor.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostWell it's still offensive.
How would you like it if your boss came in the morning and gloated about the fact that your son had just died.
Would you consider that free speech? because that is basically what this was about.
Leave a comment:
-
I think the title 'Anti-police tee shirt' is a bit of an understatement though. You could have an general anti police statement and get away with it. This was directly related to a serious incident which puts it in a different catagory.
Voicing your opinion of the police should be ok but being grossly offensive, lacking in common sense and being an utter moron should get you in trouble IMO.
EDIT... It also says in the article that he is 'a serial offender'. Anyone normal would probably get a severe bollocking about this but if he is a serial offender then there is no wiggle room.Last edited by northernladuk; 19 October 2012, 16:00.
Leave a comment:
-
Well it's still offensive.Originally posted by escapeUK View PostBut inciting means to calculatingly say things that make people do the things you want them to do, and obviously these things have to be illegal. You also have to ask, would any rational person be incited to kill a police officer by reading his t-shirt? Clearly not. I guess this is why he wasnt charged with this offence.
How would you like it if your boss came in the morning and gloated about the fact that your son had just died.
Would you consider that free speech? because that is basically what this was about.
Leave a comment:
-
You can't say that.Originally posted by d000hg View PostFreedom of speech is stupid.
Leave a comment:
-
Hitler managed it with a few million JewsOriginally posted by escapeUK View PostBut inciting means to calculatingly say things that make people do the things you want them to do, and obviously these things have to be illegal. You also have to ask, would any rational person be incited to kill a police officer by reading his t-shirt? Clearly not. I guess this is why he wasnt charged with this offence.
Leave a comment:
-
But inciting means to calculatingly say things that make people do the things you want them to do, and obviously these things have to be illegal. You also have to ask, would any rational person be incited to kill a police officer by reading his t-shirt? Clearly not. I guess this is why he wasnt charged with this offence.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostIf you are being insulting or deliberately offensive yes of course. Telling someon to f*** off is an offence. Obviously saying f*** off wouldn't result in more than a fine. Inciting people to hate or violence is prisonable i.e. "kill a cop for fun".
Leave a comment:
-
If you are being insulting or deliberately offensive yes of course. Telling someon to f*** off is an offence. Obviously saying f*** off wouldn't result in more than a fine. Inciting people to hate or violence is prisonable i.e. "kill a cop for fun". If you were to ring the police up and ask them to arrest them because they'd told you to f** off you wouldn't get very far, but if someone was knocking on your door or ringing you up and telling you to f*** off on a regular basis I think they would.Originally posted by escapeUK View PostAre you saying that outraging a member of the public is an offence that someone should be arrested for?
That's the law, we live in a democracy and the police have a duty to uphold the law.
If you have a problem with that you need to write to your MP and start a campaign.
I don't think you'd get very far though.
You may have noticed that the moderators here will remove personally offensive posts. That's because it isn't acceptable.Last edited by BlasterBates; 19 October 2012, 15:43.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Sure is
Outraging public decency - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distu...e#mw-mf-searchLast edited by doodab; 19 October 2012, 15:34.
Leave a comment:
-
Are you saying that outraging a member of the public is an offence that someone should be arrested for?Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostActually it was "outraged" members of the public who called the police, so since this is an offence the police had an obligation to arrest him.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Leave a comment: