Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: How long have you been contracting?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How long have you been contracting?"
Collapse
-
At the beginning of my contracting career I used to have issues of being over ruled by directors or watching someone go down the wrong route. More times than not I was right and they were wrong. Sometimes I was wrong.
Now as an experienced contractor I find that my soft skills, influence, communication etc are significantly better than all of those around and above me. My technical skills are significantly lower, but I can recognise issues and through influence and approach always get a project delivered and everyone on board. It is with those skills I have been offered a Perm position not my technical skills or petulance.
As a contractor you should steer using influence. Where it is not taken you should prepare a backup plan but you should not covertly change the direction of the resource. Wait for said person to hang themselves and in their moment of need offer them a way out(even if you're not finally acknowledged for it).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by suityou01 View PostJust gone 5 years
And I'm doing really well in this gig. Possible 15 month extension on offer for team lead role on this SAP project I keep running rings round.
They have succumbed to the fact that having consistently outclassed an entire consultancy for months it might be easier to sack a few of there own and just get me to sort it
Top of my game, after a serious doldrum.
Facts are, the SAP project is going down the toilet. It is going down the toilet because the team implementing it aren't that experienced. The sponsor is also the architect and project exec and has been hands off for months. They frigged the data for SIT and now they are trying to get to UAT with proper data they are realising they have significant problems with data loads.
The senior architect has proposed a solution, which doesn't work. I have been asked for my opinion, and given it. I also gave a very simple solution which does work, and the data migration team loved it.
The architect overruled me, told everyone I was wrong, and that he was in control. They are now implementing his solution, which has lead them to a whole world of pain.
Behind closed doors they have now secretly switched to my solution, while telling everyone I was wrong and they are carrying on with plan A.
The problem I see is that as they are so inexperienced they will still **** it up even though they are now doing it my way.
And with 3 weeks left on the contract, and the entire SAP programme wanting me on their project except, you guessed it, the project exec, it aint gonna happen.
I can just imagine this exec playing with his trainset as a 3 year old not sharing with his siblings. Childlish little chunt, that puts his own ego and political spin and career bollocks ahead of delivering a project which is currently bankrupting one of the oldest companies in the UK.
Absolutely ******* disgusting.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by speling bee View PostYou make no argument. You compare the macro with the micro, and apply the rules of the micro to the macro. But with no argument. Yes, it's an analogy. It is an analogy based on the fallacy of composition.
Ergo, sas is right about you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo, composition implies that i'm saying that the whole has the same properties as the parts it is composed of because it is composed of only those parts. I am saying the nation is the part in this analogy, and the globe is the whole.Originally posted by Robinho View PostThe fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole (or even of every proper part).
Oh look, i am right again, and you are wrong again, what a surprise.
Irrespective, if the analogy is flawed then you should be able to say how, but you can't because you are wrong about that too.
Keep trying.
Leave a comment:
-
13 years but 8 of those were fixed price/working from home office.
I'm in a traditional contract now as my fixed priced client work for major oil has dried up a tad due to a bit of an oil spill a few years ago.
Nowadays, I just want a nice easy long-term contract, little stress, much cycling and motorbiking to keep fit and to pay the bills.
Totally disenfranchised with IT now, it's a young person's game, can't be bothered to keep up with the tech and just simply blag as much as I can with more focus on people skills to keep the contract going. Which I suck at, to be honest.
Just want to drink wine and cook if I'm totally honest.
Christ, that's like a CUK confessional!
Sorry, normal hyperD nonsense will resume after this break.
Leave a comment:
-
How long have you been contracting?
I walked out of permiedom 01/01/2000 without a contract to go to.
It seemed like the right thing to do at the time.
Leave a comment:
-
Barring a year of permiedom that was my first proper job, and a few cash in hand jobs as a teenager / student, my entire working life.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by speling bee View PostWrong again. In your case Google is your friend.
Oh look, i am right again, and you are wrong again, what a surprise.
Irrespective, if the analogy is flawed then you should be able to say how, but you can't because you are wrong about that too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostWhere's the retired - glad to be out of it option?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Robinho View PostNo, composition implies that i'm saying that the whole has the same properties as the parts it is composed of because it is composed of only those parts.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Today 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: