• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "CUK confirmed as a quality news source"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    Why does that name ring a bell?
    One of your sockies?

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    IR35 does NOT state that working for one company alone isn't allowed. This is how the vast majority of contractors work.
    - d000hg, Durham, 03/5/2012 16:02
    Why does that name ring a bell?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    We have made it people, CUK linked to from the DM:

    But no mention of how much Fiona Bruce's house is worth so ultimately I am disappointed
    Soon there will be a picture of your house with its worth!

    Well done

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    Nick Fitz is going to be mortified.
    I'm just astonished to see the Mail linking back to one of its sources rather than just nicking the content as usual

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by swamp View Post
    Oi! I read the Daily Mail!



    PS: Well done CUK!
    The Prosecution rests, m'lud!

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    I don't know what you mean about the spelling

    Is it aimed at beating us up? I do think they are over-reacting in terms of the numbers of people and the length of service, they do not appreciate that some projects may last a couple of years and that contractors are still required to complete these projects to prevent the burden of over-staffing once these projects are completed. It is the usual headline grabbing stats that are pushed out without any thought or understanding behind them. We all know HMR&C have some pretty complex IT projects and taking on contractors is the most sensible way of getting them done without leaving them with the burden of redundancies etc. Is it right that high level, long term workers use the same route to minimise tax? IMO probably not.
    Watching Newsnight last night, that was the conclusion of the chattering classes.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    these top civil servants are not disguised employees, which was was IR35 was all about,

    they are de facto employees.

    they wont finish their gig at the ministry this summer then move onto another gig at a call centre a week later



    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    So as not to confuse the Daily Mail readers who now flock here as a result of the link, something familiar for them to look at

    Ok, I give in. Who is she?

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by administrator View Post
    I don't know what you mean about the spelling

    Is it aimed at beating us up? I do think they are over-reacting in terms of the numbers of people and the length of service, they do not appreciate that some projects may last a couple of years and that contractors are still required to complete these projects to prevent the burden of over-staffing once these projects are completed. It is the usual headline grabbing stats that are pushed out without any thought or understanding behind them. We all know HMR&C have some pretty complex IT projects and taking on contractors is the most sensible way of getting them done without leaving them with the burden of redundancies etc. Is it right that high level, long term workers use the same route to minimise tax? IMO probably not.
    I meant an attack on LTD companies and avoiding tax and the like. Whipping up public opinion etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bunk
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
    IN all honesty I think the DM crowd will do well here, how many links on Global Warming and House Prices are there in General?
    Not enough. This place is going downhill

    Leave a comment:


  • swamp
    replied
    Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
    I for one welcome our new thick as **** Daily Mail reading overlords!
    Oi! I read the Daily Mail!



    PS: Well done CUK!

    Leave a comment:


  • administrator
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Not as a quality spelling resource I hope...

    Shame it is an article that is aimed at beating us up though. Would have been better in a more positive story :|
    I don't know what you mean about the spelling

    Is it aimed at beating us up? I do think they are over-reacting in terms of the numbers of people and the length of service, they do not appreciate that some projects may last a couple of years and that contractors are still required to complete these projects to prevent the burden of over-staffing once these projects are completed. It is the usual headline grabbing stats that are pushed out without any thought or understanding behind them. We all know HMR&C have some pretty complex IT projects and taking on contractors is the most sensible way of getting them done without leaving them with the burden of redundancies etc. Is it right that high level, long term workers use the same route to minimise tax? IMO probably not.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    IN all honesty I think the DM crowd will do well here, how many links on Global Warming and House Prices are there in General?

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    So as not to confuse the Daily Mail readers who now flock here as a result of the link, something familiar for them to look at

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X