• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

CUK confirmed as a quality news source

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I for one welcome our new thick as **** Daily Mail reading overlords!

    Comment


      #12
      So as not to confuse the Daily Mail readers who now flock here as a result of the link, something familiar for them to look at

      Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
      I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

      I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

      Comment


        #13
        IN all honesty I think the DM crowd will do well here, how many links on Global Warming and House Prices are there in General?
        Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
        I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

        I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

        Comment


          #14
          What happens in General, stays in General.
          You know what they say about assumptions!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
            Not as a quality spelling resource I hope...

            Shame it is an article that is aimed at beating us up though. Would have been better in a more positive story :|
            I don't know what you mean about the spelling

            Is it aimed at beating us up? I do think they are over-reacting in terms of the numbers of people and the length of service, they do not appreciate that some projects may last a couple of years and that contractors are still required to complete these projects to prevent the burden of over-staffing once these projects are completed. It is the usual headline grabbing stats that are pushed out without any thought or understanding behind them. We all know HMR&C have some pretty complex IT projects and taking on contractors is the most sensible way of getting them done without leaving them with the burden of redundancies etc. Is it right that high level, long term workers use the same route to minimise tax? IMO probably not.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
              I for one welcome our new thick as **** Daily Mail reading overlords!
              Oi! I read the Daily Mail!



              PS: Well done CUK!
              Cats are evil.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
                IN all honesty I think the DM crowd will do well here, how many links on Global Warming and House Prices are there in General?
                Not enough. This place is going downhill

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by administrator View Post
                  I don't know what you mean about the spelling

                  Is it aimed at beating us up? I do think they are over-reacting in terms of the numbers of people and the length of service, they do not appreciate that some projects may last a couple of years and that contractors are still required to complete these projects to prevent the burden of over-staffing once these projects are completed. It is the usual headline grabbing stats that are pushed out without any thought or understanding behind them. We all know HMR&C have some pretty complex IT projects and taking on contractors is the most sensible way of getting them done without leaving them with the burden of redundancies etc. Is it right that high level, long term workers use the same route to minimise tax? IMO probably not.
                  I meant an attack on LTD companies and avoiding tax and the like. Whipping up public opinion etc.
                  'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
                    So as not to confuse the Daily Mail readers who now flock here as a result of the link, something familiar for them to look at

                    Ok, I give in. Who is she?
                    Confusion is a natural state of being

                    Comment


                      #20
                      these top civil servants are not disguised employees, which was was IR35 was all about,

                      they are de facto employees.

                      they wont finish their gig at the ministry this summer then move onto another gig at a call centre a week later



                      (\__/)
                      (>'.'<)
                      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X