• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Night driving - what do you think?"

Collapse

  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    Driving a car is a good way to avoid shark attack. There has not been a single recorded case of a shark attacking a person driving a car. Sadly, the same cannot be said of surfboards.
    I'd imagine there must be a few cases of surfboards flying off a roofrack and smacking a following car so you're probably right.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Driving a car is a good way to avoid shark attack. There has not been a single recorded case of a shark attacking a person driving a car. Sadly, the same cannot be said of surfboards.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Most drivers who have accidents are wearing underwear. Ban underwear.
    But the proportion of people driving without underwear who crash is probably higher than those who are wearing it.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    Yeah night time driving on the M-way is great... nice and easy...

    until you see this:

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    I think a blanket ban is a sensible idea. Horrible, itchy things. Personally, I favour a cosy duvet when I'm driving at night.
    Most drivers who have accidents are wearing underwear. Ban underwear.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alf W
    replied
    Polish lorry drivers seem to be able to manage 36 hour non-stop journeys. Perhaps they should be looking at how they cope.

    Leave a comment:


  • BoredBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
    What does it say about driving at night while tanked up on Vodka?
    I think that there are other laws that deal with this one. Bloody killjoys that they are!!

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    Why not double the speed limit at night? It would halve the number of hours a driver needs to be on the road.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Does that mean I have to hire two drivers now? One will have to sleep in the boot while the other does his alloted time. I think the Bently has enough room if my clubs aren't in there

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    What does it say about driving at night while tanked up on Vodka?

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by Dark Black View Post
    2 hours... pah - when I used to do a lot of night rallies we'd be doing 6 hour events from around midnight with just a half hour break halfway through for fuel, and at competitive speeds too i might add.

    I thought we'd seen the end of the nanny state with labour
    What's either rally driving or the state got to do with it? The article is about research into motorway driving, and there's no mention of any government having expressed any response either for or against the recommendations made.

    There'a also a major disparity between the scaremongering in the lead ("...experts who carried out the research want governments to impose a maximum two-hour limit on continuous night-time driving") and what the experts actually said ("A maximum continuous night-time driving duration of two hours should be recommended") - a recommendation is not an imposition.

    In fact, current advice is already that you should take a break every two hours whether driving at night or in the day, so if the researchers' recommendations were implemented to the letter it would result in no change from the status quo.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Dark Black View Post
    I thought we'd seen the end of the nanny state with labour
    In this H&S indoctrinated, entitled, compensation society, haven for ambulance chasing legal firms? Cloud cuckoo land old chap.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dark Black
    replied
    lightweights...

    2 hours... pah - when I used to do a lot of night rallies we'd be doing 6 hour events from around midnight with just a half hour break halfway through for fuel, and at competitive speeds too i might add.

    I thought we'd seen the end of the nanny state with labour

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    That will work really well in the UK where mid winter it's dark by 4pm, I'd imagine it's the same in many parts of northern Europe.
    Don't forget driving in the morning before 8am in winter. If you set off at 5am you could easily be driving for 2 or more hours in the dark.

    Anyway the research in the article is not statistically valid for a number of reasons including the sample size, the age of the participants and the gender of the participants.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Yeah night time driving on the M-way is great... nice and easy...

    until you see this:

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X