Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "What did Thomas Edison Invent Thread"
[QUOTE]I have always been told that DC is more dangerous. DC does not have the spark arresting property that AC does (reversing direction 60 times a second). DC switches and breakers are more difficult to design.
The selection of 60 Hz and 50 Hz was probably somewhat arbitrary selected. It is just a function of what rpm the generator is spun at and the number of poles. If I remember correctly, AC power for many intracity rail lines was (is) at 16 2/3 Hz.
The electric chair was a marketing ploy by Edison to create the illusion that AC was the "death" current. DC current would also work for an electric chair, it would just be more dangerous for the executioner.
Edison's vision was for there to be numerous distributed DC power stations (as DC does not travel well over distance). With Tesla's inventions, Westinghouse demonstrated that AC power was financially superior and permitted large central generating plants (and annoying high tension power lines everywhere). The 1892 Columbia Exposition in Chicago was electrified by Westinghouse AC power at half the price Edison offered to do it with DC. It was a pivotal point in the ascendency of AC power over DC power.
I did some work in New York City in the 1990's, and some of the older buildings still had DC systems with rectifiers to convert the incoming AC power. A carry-over from when Edison electrified the city with DC power. Rather than rewire the buildings and replace all the lighting and motors in one fell swoop, they maintained the existing systems and rectified the incoming power. The buildings I was in had curious mixes of mostly AC power with some DC power.[/QUOTE]
DC would have been much better, none of those horrible pylons disfiguring our countryside, lorries would just go round delivering huge lead acid batteries.
PS Seriously, how did he plan for DC to be distributed?
So I have been told...
It’s one of the reasons why the US runs on 110v. The cables for DC had to be very thick and it was impractical to run DC outside of cities. There were still some areas of NY running on DC up until the 30s. BTW DC high voltage is lethal and it does not throw you off the cable, it locks you to it.
DC would have been much better, none of those horrible pylons disfiguring our countryside, lorries would just go round delivering huge lead acid batteries.
PS Seriously, how did he plan for DC to be distributed?
Over huge pylons with a huge rectifier at one end and an inverter at the other.
DC would have been much better, none of those horrible pylons disfiguring our countryside, lorries would just go round delivering huge lead acid batteries.
PS Seriously, how did he plan for DC to be distributed?
This video sparked off my research inton Edison. He was a fanatical believer in DC generation and tried to discredit Tesla and Westinghouse who were generating AC. Edison executed an elephant (and later a man) to demonstrate the alleged dangers of AC
Does anyone know what Thomas Edison actually invented? Ie. Not a stolen idea or bought patent.
The first count is arguably murder, the second is definately murder.
Leave a comment: