Reply to: Some things in moderation

[MarillionFan]

So can I call spod a **** but not Cojak? Or can I call Cojak a **** as long as it's about personal matters rather than moderation issues?

edit: I don't think Cojak is a **** for the record.

No. But she does have a **** so that's ok!

[d000hg]

Swearing is fine, just not at mods who have a problem with you

A bit like real life, swearing in front of and at your mates is fine. Call your Mum a knob-jockey and it is likely to result in a slap.

So can I call spod a **** but not Cojak? Or can I call Cojak a **** as long as it's about personal matters rather than moderation issues?

edit: I don't think Cojak is a **** for the record.

[hyperD]

My "Dear points of view" Frankie Boyle joke got removed.

I don't think I've ever recovered.

[MarillionFan]

For the record. I'm not SY01's mum.

Exactly. I understand she's much more butch than you.

[NotAllThere]

For the record. I'm not SY01's mum.

[administrator]

I thought we were allowed to swear in the new forum, or did that get locked down again? I prefer people not swearing but thought it wasn't blocked any more.

Swearing is fine, just not at mods who have a problem with you

A bit like real life, swearing in front of and at your mates is fine. Call your Mum a knob-jockey and it is likely to result in a slap.

[d000hg]

Oh, and I'm giving you an infraction for inappropriate language in the original post.

I thought we were allowed to swear in the new forum, or did that get locked down again? I prefer people not swearing but thought it wasn't blocked any more.

[fullyautomatix]

It all depends on context, as usual.

In this particular case someone like cojak -



says what she wishes to do ... can't say not to her really

An infraction from that lollipop would be an honour! Who would complain?

[NotAllThere]

...
Oh, and I'm giving you an infraction for inappropriate language in the original post. ...

What about the insulting a member - I believe he may have been warned once about that already..

[cojak]

Expecting trouble this morning Cojak. All three moderators on.

LOOK OUT HES GOT A SHOOTER!!!!

abounds.

[mudskipper]

Shall we take bets on how this progresses?

16/1 - SY gets ignored and throws another hissy fit.
13/1 - The thread gets deleted
8/1 - The thread gets moved to Light Relief
11/4 - SY wets the bed
5/2 - Everyone else gets out the popcorn

Odds on starting another thread complaining about the treatment in this thread?

[realityhack]

And I'm sure he loves you too, dear!

There's a lot of love here today.

[cojak]

It all depends on context, as usual.

In this particular case someone like cojak -



says what she wishes to do ... can't say not to her really

Thank you AtW, you've summed it up in a nutshell.

I'm only rude to people I like.

I'm neutrally polite when I warn people who are new here/ genuinely offensive/ are not people I consider friends.

Hope that clears things up.

[Spacecadet]

I realise NAT that you may consider my "signal to noise ratio" to be out of acceptable levels but I consider you to be a jumped up little p r i c k with no clue what you are doing. To that end, f u c k you and the horse you rode in on you utter knob.

[MarillionFan]

Oh gawd, no more button pushing, he's trotting as fast as he can already.

Expecting trouble this morning Cojak. All three moderators on.

LOOK OUT HES GOT A SHOOTER!!!!